2021
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality indicators for blood culture: 1 year of monitoring with BacT/Alert Virtuo at a French hospital

Abstract: Introduction. Blood culture (BC) remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection. Clinical microbiology laboratories must ensure the quality of their BC process from receipt to definitive results. Aim. In this study, we followed the evolution of different quality indicators for BCs over the first year of implementation of the BacT/Alert Virtuo system in a French hospital. Methodology. In our laboratory, we instituted regul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 36.3% of collected BC bottles fulfilled the recommended BC filling volumes of 8 to 10 mL per bottle. Similar results have been shown in previous studies [6,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Only 36.3% of collected BC bottles fulfilled the recommended BC filling volumes of 8 to 10 mL per bottle. Similar results have been shown in previous studies [6,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because bacteremia and fungemia are life-threatening infections, the detection and identification of microorganisms from blood are crucial. Blood culture is commonly based on the measurement of CO 2 production, such as with the BACTEC™ FX (BD Diagnostics) system ( Chang et al, 2015 ; Peretz et al, 2015 ), or the measurement of CO 2 -derived pH changes, such as with the BacT/ALERT system (bioMérieux; Kim et al, 2015 ; Jacobs et al, 2017 ; Emeraud et al, 2021 ), by which 99% of positive Aerobic/F and Anaerobic/F bottles with BacT/Alert Virtuo (Virtuo) blood culture detection system are confirmed to be positive within 5 days ( Ransom et al, 2021 ). However, false-negative results can arise when the incubation time is set to 5 or 7 days, because of slowly proliferating microorganisms ( Peretz et al, 2015 ), insufficient blood volume ( Kim et al, 2015 ), or prior use of antimicrobial agents ( Houpikian and Raoult, 2005 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underfilled BC bottles were defined as those containing ≤7 mL; this effectively allowed a margin of up to 1 mL below the published 8-10 mL recommended range as previously described. 6,13 Positive BCs were classified as either false positive (contaminant) or true positive (indicating bacteraemia) according to accepted methods 7,14 and specialist infectious disease input as documented in clinical records. For all study patients, data including demographics, presumed source of infection, key investigation results, disposition and mortality were obtained from relevant hospital records.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%