2017
DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality indicators for early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma

Abstract: The chosen QIs for ESHL proved to be practicable to apply in this single centre review where overall compliance was high, and excellent in the latter half of the study period. We would encourage reporting of raw and corrected QI scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review included various study designs: population‐based cohort studies that typically used registry data ( n = 12 57–59,62–65,67–69,71,118 ), multicenter cohort studies ( n = 4 54,56,61,66 ), and case‐series which followed patients from a single institution ( n = 4 55,60,70,72 ) (Table 1). The studies were conducted in New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) ( n = 10 54–56,59,61,65–67,71,118 ), South Australia (SA) ( n = 4 62,63,70,72 ), Victoria (VIC) ( n = 3 57,60,69 ), Australia‐wide ( n = 2 64,68 ), and Queensland (QLD) ( n = 1 58 ). The Australia Cancer Network (ACN) CPGs (which were developed in partnership with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)) ( n = 7), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) CPGs ( n = 7), and NHMRC CPGs ( n = 5) were the most commonly used CPGs across the 20 included studies (with 7 studies referring to more than 1 CPG) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This review included various study designs: population‐based cohort studies that typically used registry data ( n = 12 57–59,62–65,67–69,71,118 ), multicenter cohort studies ( n = 4 54,56,61,66 ), and case‐series which followed patients from a single institution ( n = 4 55,60,70,72 ) (Table 1). The studies were conducted in New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) ( n = 10 54–56,59,61,65–67,71,118 ), South Australia (SA) ( n = 4 62,63,70,72 ), Victoria (VIC) ( n = 3 57,60,69 ), Australia‐wide ( n = 2 64,68 ), and Queensland (QLD) ( n = 1 58 ). The Australia Cancer Network (ACN) CPGs (which were developed in partnership with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)) ( n = 7), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) CPGs ( n = 7), and NHMRC CPGs ( n = 5) were the most commonly used CPGs across the 20 included studies (with 7 studies referring to more than 1 CPG) (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 20 included studies, 16 assessed factors associated with receipt of GRT, 54,56–65,67–69,71,118 whereas 4 studies did not 55,66,70,72 (Table 4). Factors associated with receipt of GRT have been categorized according to the WHO's five dimensions of adherence framework: patient factors, health condition factors, healthcare system and team factors, socioeconomic factors, and medical therapy factors 73 (Table 4 and Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A quality indicator is a measurable element of practice performance for which there is evidence or consensus that it can be used to assess the quality of care provided. 19 Quality indicators have been developed for non-HL 20 and proposed for early-stage HL with an emphasis on radiotherapy, 21 but there are no well-established quality indicators for medical management of HL. We based our assessment here on adherence to the nationally endorsed protocol adapted from evidence-based guidelines and benchmarks extrapolated from other available sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%