“…This review included various study designs: population‐based cohort studies that typically used registry data ( n = 12 57–59,62–65,67–69,71,118 ), multicenter cohort studies ( n = 4 54,56,61,66 ), and case‐series which followed patients from a single institution ( n = 4 55,60,70,72 ) (Table 1). The studies were conducted in New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) ( n = 10 54–56,59,61,65–67,71,118 ), South Australia (SA) ( n = 4 62,63,70,72 ), Victoria (VIC) ( n = 3 57,60,69 ), Australia‐wide ( n = 2 64,68 ), and Queensland (QLD) ( n = 1 58 ). The Australia Cancer Network (ACN) CPGs (which were developed in partnership with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)) ( n = 7), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) CPGs ( n = 7), and NHMRC CPGs ( n = 5) were the most commonly used CPGs across the 20 included studies (with 7 studies referring to more than 1 CPG) (Table 1).…”