2005
DOI: 10.1177/001440290507100202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Indicators for Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in Special Education

Abstract: This article presents quality indicators for experimental and quasi-experimental studies for special education. These indicators are intended not only to evaluate the merits of a completed research report or article but also to serve as an organizer of critical issues for consideration in research. We believe these indicators can be used widely, from assisting in the development of research plans to evaluating proposals. In this article, the framework and rationale is explained by providing brief descriptions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
962
1
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 797 publications
(996 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
962
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the term "procedural fidelity" in this article to reference teachers' procedural skill (see Sun, Merrill, & Peterson, 2001) in implementing a new curriculum, that is, the ability to implement lesson plans as they are intended. In educational research, implementation of manualized curricula or instructional approaches often utilizes measures of procedural fidelity to ensure they are implemented as intended (e.g., Justice & Ezell, 2002;Lonigan, Anthony, Bloomfield, Dyer, & Samwel, 1999; Reid & Lieneman, 2006;Wasik et al, 2006); inclusion of procedural fidelity measures are considered an "essential quality" for intervention research (Gersten et al, 2005), including research on preschool curricula implementation (e.g., Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium; see http://pcer.rti.org). Within practice, procedural fidelity measures are increasingly used to determine whether teachers are using adopted programs as intended, particularly those that are considered to be "scientifically based" and for which procedural fidelity might be a key moderator of pupil outcomes (see Glenn, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the term "procedural fidelity" in this article to reference teachers' procedural skill (see Sun, Merrill, & Peterson, 2001) in implementing a new curriculum, that is, the ability to implement lesson plans as they are intended. In educational research, implementation of manualized curricula or instructional approaches often utilizes measures of procedural fidelity to ensure they are implemented as intended (e.g., Justice & Ezell, 2002;Lonigan, Anthony, Bloomfield, Dyer, & Samwel, 1999; Reid & Lieneman, 2006;Wasik et al, 2006); inclusion of procedural fidelity measures are considered an "essential quality" for intervention research (Gersten et al, 2005), including research on preschool curricula implementation (e.g., Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium; see http://pcer.rti.org). Within practice, procedural fidelity measures are increasingly used to determine whether teachers are using adopted programs as intended, particularly those that are considered to be "scientifically based" and for which procedural fidelity might be a key moderator of pupil outcomes (see Glenn, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when possible, two raters were used to generate an agreement for the final score. In addition, all raters used the same manual and had received training on the fidelity instrument (Gersten et al, 2005).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future projects of this type should use measures of treatment integrity for training and perhaps rotate training personnel across conditions (Gersten et al, 2005). Further, future data collection processes should account for differences in ODR data collection systems by clearly analyzing reliability procedures across schools.…”
Section: Future Directions and Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preocupação com procedimentos sustentados por evidências de efetividade tem também recebido atenção, em anos recentes, no contexto da Educação Especial (Brantlinger, Jumenez, Pugach & Richardson, 2005;Gersten, Fuchs, Coyne, Greenwood & Innocenti. 2005;Thompson, Diamond, McWilliam, Snyder & Snyder, 2005).…”
Section: Clinical Significance and Reliable Change In Evaluatingunclassified