2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijqrm-03-2017-0046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality management capabilities of manufacturing industries in the Western Sydney region

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to, using a quality management assessment framework (QMAF), provide a comparative analysis of quality management capabilities of organisations categorised by size and groups, based on the Australian and New Zealand Standard Industrial Classification (ANZSIC) code. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire-based survey was used for data collection. Statistical data analysis, including descriptive statistics, multivariate and univariate analysis of variance and Hsu’s mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this evidence, researchers (e.g. Prajogo et al, 2012;Lobo et al, 2018) claim that, in general, Australian manufacturers still present a low maturity level and need to reinforce the adoption of these practices so that they fully benefit from them. The second opportunity with the highest number of citations was to foster the development of local partnerships (o 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this evidence, researchers (e.g. Prajogo et al, 2012;Lobo et al, 2018) claim that, in general, Australian manufacturers still present a low maturity level and need to reinforce the adoption of these practices so that they fully benefit from them. The second opportunity with the highest number of citations was to foster the development of local partnerships (o 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the references of the remaining 84 articles to check for relevant works frequently cited but not yet added in our review. The quantitative analysis of references did not result in the inclusion of any study, and the literature portfolio used in the study comprised these 84 studies (Abbott, 2019;Athukorala et al, 2017;Baird et al, 2011;Barnes, 2017;Beaumont, 2005;Beer, 2018;Black et al, 2015;Boaden & Sims, 2000;Boer et al, 2005;Caldera et al, 2018;Cantù et al, 2015;Clibborn, 2012;Cooney;Correia et al, 2020;Craik, 2015;Cripps et al, 2009;Dargusch & Ward, 2010;Feng et al, 2008;Fraser et al, 2013;Given, 2017;Grodach & Martin, 2020;Hasan et al, 2011;Hu et al, 2019;Jackson et al, 2018;Jayaram et al, 2014;Joiner et al, 2009;Jones, 2005;Karim et al, 2008;Kiridena et al, 2009;Le & Valadkhani, 2014;Leahy et al, 2010;Lo & Power, 2010;Lobo et al, 2009Lobo et al, , 2012Lobo et al, , 2018Logue et al, 2015;Low et al, 2007;Marks, 2009;Mo, 2009;MoosaviRad et al, 2014;Nelson et al, 2007;…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing quality has become the most significant core processes and widely accepted goal, ultimately for the competitiveness of organization [5], [6]. In quality management system (QMS), it is incorporated with design, control and development of goods, services and processes in the supply chain management in order to achieve company's goals [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%