Quality Measurement in the Software Development Life-Cycle by Statistical Metrics – A Survey

Nedeltcheva, Galia Novakova

doi:10.7763/lnse.2015.v3.180

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Requirement Evaluation1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…According to [12], the phases of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) do not accurately represent the rules and procedures that must be applied at every management level. This condition might lead to embedded risks and weaknesses in the system.…”

Section: Requirement Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Capability Maturity Model for STP aware Software Development

Sllian

Mazur

2022

JMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been an increase in the importance of software Security, Trust, and Privacy (STP). Product systems must be designed with trustworthy STP protection methods while still rendering the required benefits of applications to its consumers. As a result of this large skill gap, colleges and the software sector have found themselves in a state of supply- and-demand conflict. STP-aware software development requires a new practice Capability Maturity Model (CMM) to address this issue. In order to help colleges progressively increase their students' capacity to apply what they have learned in the classroom, this contribution provides a model that consists of 4 levels: Awareness, Curriculum, Project, and Enterprise, for STP-aware software development. Software development that is STP-aware has been shown to be quite beneficial in the development of programming talent's practice capabilities for learners.

show abstract

Section: Requirement Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%