2003
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.10062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality monitoring for early hearing detection and intervention programs to optimize performance

Abstract: The purpose of this chapter is to review the principles of quality monitoring for newborn screening programs at both a hospital and a public health level. The focus is on quality assurance in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI). The chapter addresses the need for a systems approach to quality, beginning with the birth screening, moving to follow-up re-screening and on to confirmatory evaluations and life-long intervention and management for the infants identified with permanent hearing loss. Benchm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly a pilot infant hearing screening program at a public health care immunization clinic reported an even higher initial referral rate of 14% but only evaluated the initial 5 months of implementation [27]. Suboptimal referral rates reported by the remaining 20% of universal programs in this survey may have been due to factors such as poor data management or quality control, recently commenced programs, suboptimal screening technologies (such as AOAE implemented in NICUs) and test environment or procedural issues [16,[32][33].…”
Section: Referral and Follow-up Performance And Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly a pilot infant hearing screening program at a public health care immunization clinic reported an even higher initial referral rate of 14% but only evaluated the initial 5 months of implementation [27]. Suboptimal referral rates reported by the remaining 20% of universal programs in this survey may have been due to factors such as poor data management or quality control, recently commenced programs, suboptimal screening technologies (such as AOAE implemented in NICUs) and test environment or procedural issues [16,[32][33].…”
Section: Referral and Follow-up Performance And Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, a suboptimal follow-up return rate of 60% was reported for a pilot screening program at an immunization clinic in South Africa [27]. Since hearing screening is not yet mandated or regulated in South Africa there is a lack of program quality control and no systematic protocol for tracking parents and their babies to attend follow-up appointments which may contribute to poor follow-up compliance [32][33][34]. In addition, insufficient support from other key health professionals such as family physicians and pediatricians may discourage parents from prioritizing hearing screening follow-up [16,34,37].…”
Section: Referral and Follow-up Performance And Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diagnosis with early intervention can effectively contribute to improve the child's development when followed by a proper rehabilitation program 11 . In order to achieve a quality monitoring of the neonatal hearing screening, it is necessary to have qualified professionals, control and calibration of the procedures, a database system, planning and evaluation of the procedures 12 . Considering the lack of a neonatal auditory screening program in the city of Porto Velho, Limiar Clinic implemented the first NHS program in August of 2002, at the Dr. Ary Pinheiro Base Hospital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%