2013
DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Breast Cancer Early Detection Services Conducted by Well Woman Clinics in the District of Gampaha, Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only study available in the pubmed related to this aspect is the study conducted by Vithana et al which reveals that breast cancer early detection service coverage in the Gampaha district of Sri Lanka remained low (2.2%) in 2007, 11 years after commencing WWCs. [7] The cancer incidence data of Sri Lanka for 2015, the latest issue, reveals that majority of patients present at clinical stage II (40.0%). Only 13.0% patients have presented at stage I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only study available in the pubmed related to this aspect is the study conducted by Vithana et al which reveals that breast cancer early detection service coverage in the Gampaha district of Sri Lanka remained low (2.2%) in 2007, 11 years after commencing WWCs. [7] The cancer incidence data of Sri Lanka for 2015, the latest issue, reveals that majority of patients present at clinical stage II (40.0%). Only 13.0% patients have presented at stage I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No studies were found from Afghanistan, Bhutan, or the Maldives. Most of the (n = 10) intervention took place at the hospital or clinic level [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] whereas some (n = 3) were based on community setting [31][32][33] .…”
Section: Systematic Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of the included studies (n = 8) were cross-sectional 22,23,25,26,28,29,31,33 followed by RCTs (n = 3) 21,30,32 , nonrandomized before-after intervention study (n = 1) ( 27) and qualitative study (n = 1) 24 (Table 1).…”
Section: Systematic Review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons suggested are the lack of knowledge of the services that are offered and disinterest in seeking accurate information. [ 3 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%