2014
DOI: 10.1111/jhq.12001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Care in a Low-Income Consumer-Driven Health Plan: Assessment of Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) Scores for Secondary Prevention

Abstract: The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) may create an estimated 16 million new Medicaid enrollees. This underscores the need to develop innovative strategies to provide efficient care to this population without compromising quality. To address concerns that consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) and cost sharing discourage individuals from seeking needed care, we examined the Healthcare Effectiveness Data Information Set (HEDIS) measures of secondary prevention for a CDHP of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have shown better chronic care by coupling QI programs and EHR systems in large integrated organizations [6,7,16], but to our knowledge this is the first report that describes the effect in small, independent, and predominantly rural primary care. The chronic care results attained by PF+cEHR+MU practices exceeded averages for all 3 measures as reported for commercially insured patients and for national Medicaid data [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Previous reports have shown better chronic care by coupling QI programs and EHR systems in large integrated organizations [6,7,16], but to our knowledge this is the first report that describes the effect in small, independent, and predominantly rural primary care. The chronic care results attained by PF+cEHR+MU practices exceeded averages for all 3 measures as reported for commercially insured patients and for national Medicaid data [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%