2003
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05591.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of care provided by general practitioners using or not using Division‐based diabetes registers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is dissonance between the relatively high rates of routine checks and apparent lack of therapeutic action on glycaemia among Indigenous patients compared with general practice in New South Wales 14 , 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is dissonance between the relatively high rates of routine checks and apparent lack of therapeutic action on glycaemia among Indigenous patients compared with general practice in New South Wales 14 , 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important milestone to develop not only epidemiological research, but also for quality improvement. Some results have shown that those professionals who participate in diabetes registries provide a more evidence‐based care than those who did not [43].In this sense, the availability of annual descriptive reports submitted to case managers, along with health care policy makers and executives will constitute an additional element for decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, many organizations reported that these registries were not linked to clinical data, suggesting that the registries are not in active use. Given that studies show that chronic disease registries, when fully utilized, appear to be associated with better clinical processes and outcomes, 14–18 the lack of active registries among most physician organizations indicates a problem that needs attention. In this study, organizations with registries are more likely to provide feedback to physicians about their quality of care and to have patient reminder systems (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies suggest that chronic disease registries, if utilized in 1 or more of these ways, can improve clinical processes and outcomes for patients with diabetes 14–18 . But while registries are a vital component of CMPs, the extent to which registries are utilized by organizations caring for patients with chronic illness is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%