Quality of diabetes care for adults with physical disabilities in Kansas

Reichard, Amanda; Stolzle, Hayley; Sella, Ana Carolina; Shireman, Theresa I.

doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.09.003

Cited by 13 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies have shown that women with disabilities have a higher risk of depression compared to men with disability [ 24 ]. It has also been reported that diabetes is associated with physical disability [ 25 ] as well as with intellectual disability [ 26 , 27 ]. The higher risk of non-communicable diseases like hypertension and diabetes is likely to be related to the relative lack of physical activity among people with disability, resulting in higher rates of obesity among people with disability compared to the general population [ 28 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reproductive health of women with and without disabilities in South India, the SIDE study (South India Disability Evidence) study: a case control study

John

Sagar

2014

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundEvidence shows that women with disability have adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those without a disability. There is a lack of published data on reproductive health of women with disability in India till date. The objective of the South India Disability Evidence (SIDE) Study was to compare reproductive health parameters including pregnancy experience, health access during pregnancy and type of delivery among women with disability compared to women with no disability.MethodsThe study was conducted in one district each in two States (Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka) in 2012. A case-control design was used to identify appropriate age and sex-matched controls for women with disability identified through a population-based survey. Trained key informants first listed women with disabilities who were then examined by a medical team to confirm the diagnosis. Trained research investigators administered questionnaire schedules to both groups of women to collect information on reproductive health and outcomes of any pregnancy experienced in the past two years.ResultsA total of 247 women with disability and 324 age-matched controls aged 15-45 years were recruited for the study. 87% of the women with disability had a physical disability. The mean age of women with disability was 29.86 against 29.71 years among women without a disability. A significantly lower proportion of women with disability experienced pregnancy (36.8%) compared to women without a disability (X2 –16.02 P <0.001). The odds ratio for suffering from diabetes among women with disability compared to women without a disability was 19.3(95% CI: 1.2- 313.9), while it was 9.5 (95% CI: 2.2-40.8) for depression. A higher proportion of women without a disability (7.7%) compared to women with a disability (5.3%) reported a successful pregnancy in the past two years. There were no statistically significant differences between women with and without a disability with regard to utilization of antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes.ConclusionsThe study provides evidence on some reproductive health parameters of women with disability in India for the first time ever. The findings will help in formulating policy and to develop specific interventions to improve pregnancy outcomes for women with disability in India.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reproductive health of women with and without disabilities in South India, the SIDE study (South India Disability Evidence) study: a case control study

John

Sagar

2014

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The general characteristics of the 20 included articles are shown in Table . The sample size of the articles ranged from four (Oehler‐Giarratana & Fitzgerald, ) to 3,722 (Reichard et al, ). Regarding type of disability, seven articles were focused on people with developmental disabilities, eight articles on people with visual impairment, four articles on people with physical disabilities, particularly amputees, and one did not mention the type of disability.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Co‐existing complications, perceptions of an adverse health service, the lack of information, and uncertainty, fear, sadness, loss, and shock were also barriers (Livingstone et al, ). On the other hand, sociodemographic factors such as age, comorbid hypertension, dual Medicare eligibility, female gender, and perceived social support and sense of hope were reported as facilitators (Livingstone et al, ; Pham et al, ; Reichard et al, ). One article attempted to prove the effectiveness of specialist foot care programs for diabetes risk management, but reported no significant differences in people with a physical disability (Carrington et al, ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of study designs, seven articles used a qualitative design (Cardol et al, 2012;Hale et al, 2011;Kaminsky et al, 2014;Livingstone et al, 2011;Rouse & Finlay, 2016;Whitehead et al, 2016;Williams, 2002) and 12 used a quantitative design including quasi-experimental studies (Bernbaum et al, 1989;Carrington et al, 2001;Oehler-Giarratana & Fitzgerald, 1980;Prior et al, 1984;Trozzolino et al, 2003;Windecker et al, 1997), retrospective cohort studies (Patel et al, 2016;Reichard et al, 2012;Shireman et al, 2010;Tseng et al, 2006), and cross-sectional studies (Pham et al, 1996;Taggart et al, 2013). One article used participatory action research (Williams, 2005).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For people with a physical disability, reported barriers to diabetes self-care behaviors included living in medically underserved areas, feeling overwhelmed by perceived barriers, and experiencing mobility limitations (Livingstone et al, 2011;Pham et al, 1996;Reichard et al, 2012). Coexisting complications, perceptions of an adverse health service, the lack of information, and uncertainty, fear, sadness, loss, and shock were also barriers (Livingstone et al, 2011).…”

Section: Physical Disabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Diabetes self‐care behaviors in adults with disabilities: A systematic review

Yang

Kim

Ryu

et al. 2019

Japan Journal Nursing Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim The integrated evidence on diabetes self‐care behaviors in people with a disability is not commensurate with the growing number of people with both diabetes and a disability. This study aims to identify factors influencing self‐care behaviors in adults with diabetes and a disability based on a thorough review of the current evidence. Methods This review followed the Cochrane guidelines for systematic review research and complies with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis. To find eligible articles, five electronic databases—PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Psych‐articles, and the Cochrane Library—were searched, from the beginning of the chronological period covered by each database to June 2017. Four researchers independently conducted study selections, extracted data, and assessed the data quality. Results Twenty studies were reviewed to identify barriers to and facilitators of diabetes self‐care behaviors. For people with developmental disabilities, the most prominent facilitator of self‐care behaviors was the support they received for the behaviors. For people with visual impairments, that facilitator was the use of helpful assistive devices that take advantage of another sense. The main barriers to self‐care behaviors were mobility limitation for people with physical disabilities and lack of accessibility for people with visual impairments. Conclusions This review has identified barriers to and facilitators of diabetes self‐care behaviors by type of disability. Healthcare services need to be tailored to these facilitators and barriers, and differentiated by type of disability.

show abstract

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status

Tran

2021

J Primary Prevent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality of diabetes care for adults with physical disabilities in Kansas

Cited by 13 publications

References 20 publications

Reproductive health of women with and without disabilities in South India, the SIDE study (South India Disability Evidence) study: a case control study

Reproductive health of women with and without disabilities in South India, the SIDE study (South India Disability Evidence) study: a case control study

Diabetes self‐care behaviors in adults with disabilities: A systematic review

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About