Quality of Endoscopy Reports for Esophageal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?

Barbetta, Arianna; Faraz, Shahdabul; Shah, Pari; Gerdes, Hans; Hsu, Meier; Tan, Kay See; Nobel, Tamar; Bains, Manjit S.; Bott, Matthew; Isbell, James M.; Sewell, David B.; Jones, David R.; Molena, Daniela

doi:10.1007/s11605-018-3710-4

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A study from 2018 investigated the quality of endoscopy reports for 119 patients undergoing esophagectomy due to esophageal cancer and found that only 34% of EGD reports met their criteria for “good-quality” reports. 19 Quality was higher at the specialized institution compared to other hospitals. They did not evaluate how often low-quality reports led to inappropriate surgical treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

Assessing the benefits of repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy at a specialized center before gastric and esophageal cancer surgery

Christensen,

Egeland,

Bjoern Heje

et al. 2024

Scand J Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The surgical treatment of gastric and esophageal cancer in Denmark is centralized in four specialized esophagogastric cancer (EGC) centers. Patients are referred after an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at a secondary healthcare facility. The EGD is repeated at the specialized EGC center before determining a surgical treatment strategy. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the quality of EGDs performed at a secondary healthcare facility and evaluate the clinical value of repeated EGD at a specialized center when determining the surgical treatment strategy. Methods: Patients from three of the four centers, who underwent esophagectomy or gastrectomy with curative intent from 1 June 2016 to 1 May 2021, were included. EGD reports from the referral facilities and EGC centers were compared based on a predefined checklist. Furthermore, endoscopist experience, the time between examinations, and histology were registered. Finally, it was assessed whether the specialized EGD led to any substantial changes in surgical treatment. Baseline characteristics and differences in EGD reports were described and McNemar’s chi-square test was performed. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for a change in surgical strategy. Results: The study included 953 patients who underwent both an initial EGD and EGD at referral to a specialized center. In 644 cases (68%), the information from the initial EGD was considered insufficient concerning preoperative tumor information. In 113 (12%) cases, the findings in the specialized EGD would lead to a significant alteration in the surgical strategy compared with the primary EGD. Conclusion: The findings suggest that repeated EGD at a specialized center is of clinical value and helps ensure proper surgical treatment for patients undergoing curative surgery for gastroesophageal cancer.

show abstract