2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2014.2344658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Experience Provision in the Future Internet

Abstract: This work deals with the satisfaction of the quality of\ud experience (QoE) requirements in the perspective of the emerging\ud future Internet framework. The evolution of the Internet is pointing\ud out its limitations, which are likely to hinder its potential. In\ud this respect, this paper introduces an innovative approach to cope\ud with some key limitations of the present communication networks.\ud In particular, the need of efficiently utilizing the available network\ud resources and of guaranteeing the u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, both the Perceived and the Target QoE should be computed by a suitable QoE Evaluator based on suitable Feedback Parameters resulting from the real-time monitoring of the network, as well as from direct or indirect feedbacks coming from users and/or applications. For a more detailed description of the way the QoE functionalities are embedded in the Future Internet architecture, see [17], [18] and [19].…”
Section: Qoe Controller Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, both the Perceived and the Target QoE should be computed by a suitable QoE Evaluator based on suitable Feedback Parameters resulting from the real-time monitoring of the network, as well as from direct or indirect feedbacks coming from users and/or applications. For a more detailed description of the way the QoE functionalities are embedded in the Future Internet architecture, see [17], [18] and [19].…”
Section: Qoe Controller Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that, at each time instant tk, the QoE Controller has to decide, in real time, which is the most appropriate CoS to be associated with each in-progress application instance (e.g., if the Agents are embedded in mobile user terminals, the QoE Controller decisions can be implemented by inserting the selected CoS identifier in the header of the packets transmitted by the terminals). Up to the authors' knowledge, apart from [18], [19], [12] and [23], such a dynamic assignment approach has never been investigated so far.…”
Section: Users Applications Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the study of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) has become a topic of great interest for control system researchers, as CPSs bring together problems derived from classical control theory with concerns related to computer science and cyber-security [1]. In their most general definition, CPSs can be considered as interconnected systems that integrate both physical capabilities and computing power [2] and have found application in several fields, spacing from manufacturing [3], healthcare [4], telecommunication [5]- [7] and transportation [8] networks, power systems [9], [10] and aerospace [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several algorithms converging to Wardrop equilibria have been proposed in the literature (e.g., for routing [26] and load balancing [27]), the algorithm proposed in this paper is the first one applied to QoE control. A first attempt to QoE control can be found in [28], where an optimal control approach was proposed for a simple homogeneous network scenario. The convergence to a Wardrop equilibrium can guarantee fairness among all the running applications (all the flows experience the same QoE value, in terms of Mean Opinion Score (MOS)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%