2016
DOI: 10.1080/1389224x.2016.1230069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of extension advice: a gendered case study from Ghana and Sri Lanka

Abstract: Purpose: Women farmers have less access to extension services than male farmers, even though they make up almost half of the global agricultural workforce. Gender-focused international development programmes have focused on how ensuring women receive better access to advice. However, the quality of the technical advice and the service women receive in comparison to male farmers needs better understanding. Study design/methodology/approach: Five thousand interactions between male and female extension workers ('… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is contrary to past research that shows that extension services are generally geared towards giving advice to male rather than female farmers. 38 Other results 39 are in line with this study as they report no significant differences in quality of advice given to male and female farmers at plant clinics in a study conducted in Ghana and Sri Lanka. This may be due to the availability of other non-traditional approaches e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is contrary to past research that shows that extension services are generally geared towards giving advice to male rather than female farmers. 38 Other results 39 are in line with this study as they report no significant differences in quality of advice given to male and female farmers at plant clinics in a study conducted in Ghana and Sri Lanka. This may be due to the availability of other non-traditional approaches e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Lukuyu et al (2012) suggest that farmer trainers would normally disseminate simple technologies such as crop varieties compared to complex ones with higher risks such as crop protection, which alludes to the knowledge they have and their confidence to disseminate such information. Lamontagne-Godwin et al (2017); Ragasa et al (2013) on the other hand suggest differences in cropping patterns, and anticipated farmers' ability to access the various technologies or recommended options as the reason for providing different recommendations by trainers. This implies that even with enhanced knowledge and information dissemination approaches, the type of advice given by trainers is largely conditioned by predicted availability, access, and affordability of recommended practices by farmers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, what type of issues did the women bring to the clinics and are they reflective of the roles they have in agriculture (Doss 2002)? Secondly, were the recommendations they were given to deal with the plant health problem gender aware, an issue highlighted in previous studies (Lamontagne-Godwin et al 2017). Finally, are clinics' being held at locations and timings suitable to women's schedules?…”
Section: Perceptions Of Plantwise Institutional Impacts From a Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research shows women are indeed deprived overall in socioeconomic terms as they have less opportunity for education, training, extension services and technology as compared to men (Hassan et al 2007;Lamontagne-Godwin et al 2018). In Pakistan for example, information access between genders is unequal-less than 10% of women access agricultural information from public sources, compared to 25% for men (Lamontagne-Godwin et al 2017, 2018. This situation is exacerbated by, and indeed a result of, historical patriarchal socio-cultural norms in a country (Harari 2014;Rao and Kelleher 2003), which is particularly the case in Pakistan (Tsegaye et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%