Quality of life after minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer

Abstract

of life after minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:42. http://dx. AbstractTraditional open surgical technique for rectal cancer is associated with significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. Multiple structures are at risk during total mesorectal excision, which may have profound impact on sexual function, and urinary and fecal continence. In addition, having a temporary or permanent ostomy can have a significant effect on overall well-being. Patients have reported post-operative problems such as chronic wounds, poor body image, inhibited work and social function. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is an evolving component of colon and rectal cancer treatment that may have benefits over open surgery. The increasing role of laparoscopy for colon and rectal cancer has been associated with decreased morbidity, improved pain control, and reduced length of stay. However, laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer remains technically difficult due to the inherent limitations of operating in the pelvis. Robotic surgery is a newer method for treating rectal cancer developed to overcome these limitations. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal MIS are techniques to achieve local excision, avoiding proctectomy in select patients, potentially improving functional outcomes. Transanal total mesorectal excision is an even newer technique to facilitate dissection of low rectal cancers. Controversy remains about equivalence in oncologic outcomes when these MIS approaches are used for rectal cancer. Even more unclear is the effect of MIS approaches on quality of life and how they compare to open surgery. This review discusses the most current evidence on the impact of various MIS techniques on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Keywords:Quality of life, rectal cancer, minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic, robotic, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, transanal minimally invasive surgery, transanal total mesorectal excision DECLARATIONS Authors' contributionsConception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting and revising the work: Chen JH, Bello BL Conception and design of the work, revising the work:

Male Genitourinary Dysfunction as a Consequence of Colorectal Surgery

“…The studies can all be criticized as small, single center, and with a retrospective design. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic proctectomy is equally problematic and fraught with poor-quality studies giving variable results in regard to postoperative male sexual function [25,26].…”