2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00361-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life after parotid-sparing IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: A prospective longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
173
0
11

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
173
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some patients still die of their disease, particularly those with larger tumors. The preliminary tumor control in patients treated with IMRT has been promising; however, when analyzing the patterns of failure, studies have shown that tumors tend to recur within the GTV, which can lead to greater distant metastasis rates (35,36,(55)(56)(57)(58)(59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some patients still die of their disease, particularly those with larger tumors. The preliminary tumor control in patients treated with IMRT has been promising; however, when analyzing the patterns of failure, studies have shown that tumors tend to recur within the GTV, which can lead to greater distant metastasis rates (35,36,(55)(56)(57)(58)(59).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many surveys that monitored the results of RT in patients with head and neck cancer, xerostomia usually was cited as the most prevalent late complication. [28][29][30][31][32] It has been reported that patient-reported xerostomia is correlated significantly with the mean RT dose to the parotid glands and the minor salivary glands in the oral cavity. 33 Our study further confirmed that RT technique is the unique variable affecting xerostomia in NPC survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients were included in previous publications which analyzed parotid gland dose-effect relationships, the relationships between the parotid and submandibular salivary flows and xerostomia and QOL, or dysphagia-specific endpoints (3)(4)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). All patients signed an informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%