1997
DOI: 10.1159/000480876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Life and Health in Patients with Urinary Diversion: A Comparison of Incontinent versus Continent Urinary Diversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Boyd et al 2 reported that there was no significant difference in psychological and emotional status between patients with an ileal conduit and those with a continent urinary reservoir and that patients of both groups could accept, adapt and generally be satisfied with either the continent or non-continent form of urinary diversion. Our results and those of Filipas et al 11 support this opinion. Gerharz et al 5 reported significant superiority of CR regarding all stoma-related items, global quality of life, physical strength, mental capacity, leisure time activities and social competence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Boyd et al 2 reported that there was no significant difference in psychological and emotional status between patients with an ileal conduit and those with a continent urinary reservoir and that patients of both groups could accept, adapt and generally be satisfied with either the continent or non-continent form of urinary diversion. Our results and those of Filipas et al 11 support this opinion. Gerharz et al 5 reported significant superiority of CR regarding all stoma-related items, global quality of life, physical strength, mental capacity, leisure time activities and social competence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A similar study was published in 2004 [15] , which reported a small increase in ‘mental’ quality of life (QoL) and an insignificant decrease in ‘physical’ QoL, when comparing preoperative with 1-year follow-up data. Similar results, despite differences between groups, have been obtained in five retrospective trials (level of evidence 3) [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] . These trials all mentioned that stomal dysfunctions were frequent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Most patients reported that their interest and life volition, personal abilities, family relations, and overall quality of life were ‘very good’. This probably reflects the adaptability of patients who have a Mainz pouch II and real improvements in their quality of life [26–28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%