2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in a cohort of men with epilepsy compared to a healthy population and those with common chronic diseases in the UK using a generic patient-reported outcome measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In 2013, a World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-life 26-question short form was used to compare 149 patients with epilepsy to 1,238 healthy English citizens, contributing valuable insights to psychosocial disease effects. 36 In fact, a series of studies have suggested that the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 is useful for monitoring outcomes in a wide range of clinical and service settings. One advantage of adopting an internationally accepted instrument is the ability to allow crosscountry comparisons.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 In 2013, a World Health Organization (WHO) quality-of-life 26-question short form was used to compare 149 patients with epilepsy to 1,238 healthy English citizens, contributing valuable insights to psychosocial disease effects. 36 In fact, a series of studies have suggested that the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 is useful for monitoring outcomes in a wide range of clinical and service settings. One advantage of adopting an internationally accepted instrument is the ability to allow crosscountry comparisons.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel methods have been developed to measure the psychosocial and cognitive changes and their neural correlates in different types of epilepsy in relation to the pharmacological or surgical treatment [23,24]. Therefore, new researchers in the field of epilepsy may find a wide spectrum of valid measurements in the Journal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%