2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00171-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in an urban Asian population: the impact of ethnicity and socio-economic status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
82
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
17
82
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In western European countries and in U.S the association between SES and health follows a common pattern [1][2][3]6,12,13 : the lower the socioeconomic status the poorer the health. Similar results have been obtained from different countries in respect to cultural background or economic growth [14][15][16][17] . In an attempt to describe the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on health outcomes, researchers have summarized six categories of variables that might affect the association between SES and health: socio-demographic, economic, environmental, behavioral and psychological, physiological and health outcome variables 18 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In western European countries and in U.S the association between SES and health follows a common pattern [1][2][3]6,12,13 : the lower the socioeconomic status the poorer the health. Similar results have been obtained from different countries in respect to cultural background or economic growth [14][15][16][17] . In an attempt to describe the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on health outcomes, researchers have summarized six categories of variables that might affect the association between SES and health: socio-demographic, economic, environmental, behavioral and psychological, physiological and health outcome variables 18 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We propose that this apparent discrepancy should be understood in the above context of a complex relationship of psycho-social and cognitive factors, including the likelihood of a unique psychological sensitivity in Indians vis-a-vis Chinese and Malays. In the same context, it is worth noting that the observed ethnic differences in adolescent QOL are at variance from the results of earlier QOL studies of Singaporean adults [18]. That study showed the reverse: better HRQOL scores are reported by Chinese adults, and the worst HRQOL scores are reported by Indian adults, which were also independent of socio-economic differences, and generally accorded with known differences in physical health status.…”
Section: Ethnic and Cultural Differencesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Conversely, it also supports the widely held anecdotal observation that among adult cancer patients, the Chinese are more stoic and generally less 'psychologically aware'. The limited published information on ethnic differences in mental health status of children in Singapore indicated that Indians adolescents have had higher risk of attempted suicides and suicides [17,18], although whether this has persisted remains undetermined. We propose that this apparent discrepancy should be understood in the above context of a complex relationship of psycho-social and cognitive factors, including the likelihood of a unique psychological sensitivity in Indians vis-a-vis Chinese and Malays.…”
Section: Ethnic and Cultural Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically significant differences have been demonstrated among various racial groups in Singapore, 22 where Chinese scored highest in five out of eight scales of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) compared with their Malay and Indian counterparts. This instrument is a validated, self-administered questionnaire that measured health-related quality of life across various domains, with higher scores indicative of better-perceived health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%