2014
DOI: 10.1590/s2317-64312014000300001353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in aphasia: differences between fluent and non-fluent aphasic Augmentative and Alternative Communication users

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted by Mariana Mendes Bahia et al on quality of life after post stroke aphasia and differences between uent and non-uent aphasia where the result showed high score in uent aphasia which shows that better quality of life than the non-uent aphasia [25]. Non uent aphasia may cause di culty in communication which affects the psychologically due to depression, anxiety, stress social isolation, and dependency on caregivers to communicate and participate in any task involves effort or energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Mariana Mendes Bahia et al on quality of life after post stroke aphasia and differences between uent and non-uent aphasia where the result showed high score in uent aphasia which shows that better quality of life than the non-uent aphasia [25]. Non uent aphasia may cause di culty in communication which affects the psychologically due to depression, anxiety, stress social isolation, and dependency on caregivers to communicate and participate in any task involves effort or energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a statistically significant difference was noted in the overall quality of life in patients with complete, severe, and moderate aphasia. Bachia and Chun [38] found that people with non-fluent aphasia rate their quality of life as poorer than people with fluent aphasia. The three most affected domains are language, social roles, and thinking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicit criterion was used when the evaluation does not present the category nor the dimension related to such criteria; however, the approach of these aspects is implicit in the protocol questions. It should be mentioned that there are few studies addressing individuals with aphasia, especially due to the difficulty to apply the evaluations to deal with linguistic-cognitive alterations 37 . This condition may also explain the fact that publications were unstable over the years.…”
Section: Fm Amat Bdi-ii VImentioning
confidence: 99%