Quality of life in Lithuanian population: the impact of country residence and socio-economic status

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Quality of life (QoL) and individual perception of health has become a subject of great interest in Lithuania. The relationships between country residence, socio-economic status (SES), and QoL have not been well characterized among the Lithuanian urban and rural populations. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of country residence and SES on QoL in Lithuanian urban and rural population adjusting for the influence of other known determinants of QoL. The study population was randomly selected from 1193 urban and 264 rural men and women aged 45–72 years and have been filled in the self-administered the WHOQOL-100 questionnaire. The survey participation rate was 62.8%. Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-100 showed good internal reliability of Cronbach’s α from 0.78 to 0.94. Multiple linear regression models were used to study the influence of country residence and SES on the WHOQOL-100 scores while adjusting for the influence of other determinants of QoL. After adjusting for the influence of these factors, country residence and SES independently influenced QoL. Rural residence negatively affected the overall QoL, psychological domain, level of independence and spirituality. Higher education level and income directly and positively influenced the WHOQOL-100 scores, while retired, unemployed and residents with chronic medical conditions had negative influence WHOQOL-100 scores. The study results conclude that country residence and SES are associated with differences in QoL among urban and rural Lithuanian population.</jats:p>

Socio-economic correlates of quality of life in single and married urban individuals: a Polish case study

“…Similarly, in the study by Wang et al [ 33 ], the respondents' quality of life was significantly and positively associated with the level of annual income. An increase in the values of health-related quality of life with the improvement of material situation, mainly the income level, was also reported by Nayir et al [ 16 ], Kulik et al [ 51 ], Rėklaitienė et al [ 52 ], Kooi-Yau Chean et al [ 53 ], Povey et al [ 54 ], Han et al [ 41 ], Huang et al [ 55 ] and Song et al [ 38 ]. The highest quality of life assessment in people with the highest income was found by Rezaei et al [ 17 ], while the lowest quality of life assessment in people with the lowest income by Zhang et al [ 56 ].…”

The impact of ethnicity, place of residence and socioeconomic status on health-related quality of life: results from a Greek health survey

“…The multiple regression analysis though did not confirm such a high impact since only two scales, general health and mental health was statistically influenced in the rural population. It is of interest that some studies demonstrated that the rural population in America reports better satisfaction with their health status (Cleary and Howell 2006;Philip et al 2002) and that inhabitants of village communities are more satisfied with their life situation which improves their health status perception (Reklaitiene et al 2009). The residence-specific analysis showed that primary education was associated with impaired HRQoL in both rural and urban areas, whereas the impact of income was more profound for the rural residents.…”

Activities with Higher Influence on Quality of Life in Older Adults in Japan

“…Major efforts in different areas of knowledge are being made to attend to this population's growing demands. In the health sciences, many studies have been developed to investigate their quality of life (QOL) (Kato et al, ; Walker, ; Rėklaitienė et al, ).…”