Quality of Life in Patients with Excellent 3-Month Clinical Outcome after First-Ever Ischemic Stroke: A Time to Redefine Excellent Outcome?

Abstract

Background and aims: Ischemic stroke (IS) may have impact on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) even in the patients with good clinical outcome, and tools mostly used for the assessment of outcome may underestimate or not reflect all relevant sequels after IS. We aimed to analyse HRQoL in the patients with excellent outcome after IS. Methods: We analysed consecutive IS patients enrolled in the prospective FRAILTY study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04839887) with excellent three-month clinical outcome (score 0-1 in modified Rankin Scale, mRS). Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) version 3.0 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used for the HRQoL, anxiety and depression assessments, and subgroup comparisons were performed according to NIHSS score (0, ≥1), age (50 <, ≥ 50 years) and sex. Results: In total, 158 patients (55.7% men, mean age 60.3 ± 13.4 years) were analysed and 72.2% of them had score 0 in mRS. The overall lowest median scores were found in the SIS domain “emotion”, “strength” and “participation”. Patients with NIHSS ≥ 1 had lower scores in all SIS domains except “emotions” and “mobility”. Patients ≥ 50 years had lower score in “mobility” (p=0.004), and females in domain of “social participation” (p=0.044). No differences were found among all subgroups in HADS anxiety and depression. Age, NIHSS score and depression were found negative predictors for the physical domains of HRQoL. Conclusions: Despite excellent three-month clinical outcome after IS, patients had affected substantially their HRQoL, especially those with NIHSS ≥ 1. Patients ≥ 50 years had more affected “mobility” and females “social participation”.