Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory

Kotzampasakis, Dimitrios; Piniara, Anastasia; Themelis, Sotirios; Kotzampasakis, Stylianos; Gabriel, Eustratios; Maroudias, Nikos; Nikolopoulos, Thomas P.

doi:10.1002/lary.26517

Cited by 14 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The lack of difference between the two groups in quality of life might be due to the small sample size and utilization of the convenience sampling method in the current study. The results of the present study, however, are in line with those of the study by Kotzampasakis et al ., indicating a significant increase in quality of life after rhinoplasty,[ 18 ] however, inconsistent with the results of the study by Yang et al ., reporting evident improvement in the quality of life after rhinoplasty in all the studied patients;[ 19 ] Cultural differences in the two communities studied (our study and those cited) as well as the lack of quality of life after rhinoplasty may be the main reasons for these differences.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

Comparison of emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and control group

Shahidi

Mahdavi

Gol

2020

J Edu Health Promot

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION: Psychological factors affect the tendency of individuals toward cosmetic surgeries although their contribution has not been clearly understood. Therefore, the current study aimed at comparing the emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and the control group. METHODS: The current case–control study was conducted on 160 individuals referring to Rhinoplasty Clinic of Imam Reza Hospital in Tabriz, Iran, from 2018 to 2019. The tools used in this study including demographic information, Schering's emotional intelligence questionnaire (α = 0.75–0.85), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (α = 0.75), and body image (α = 0.77–0.91) were used to collect data. Data were analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and t -tests for the two independent groups. P < 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the overall mean of emotional intelligence and its subcomponents ( P > 0.05), except social skills, such as self-awareness ( P = 0.019). Appearance evaluation and appearance orientation variables were statistically significant between the two groups ( P < 0.05), while the quality of life was not statistically significant ( P = 0.051). CONCLUSION: In the psychological parameters studied, we found that the appearance evaluation and social skills of the rhinoplasty applicants are low, and it is better to have interventions before the rhinoplasty in people who have difficulty with these variables.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

Comparison of emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and control group

Shahidi

Mahdavi

Gol

2020

J Edu Health Promot

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interestingly, the findings of our study, which detected an increase in EQ-5D VAS score larger than 9.5 in the cohort of all patients included in the study, in the group of patients with NAO before surgery, and in the group of patients with septal correction but not in the groups of patients in which the increase of EQ-5D VAS after surgery was not significant (►Table 1), corroborate the MCID of the EQ-5D VAS score as defined by Fuller et al 11 An improvement of generic HRQoL after rhinoplasty was also demonstrated by studies using EQ-5D VAS, 12 World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL) 13,14 and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI). [15][16][17][18] Contrary to the findings of these studies, Zojaji et al used General Health Questionnaire and WHOQOL to assess changes after aesthetic rhinoplasty and could find no improvement in HRQoL except for the psychologic-related health domains. 19 Studying long-term changes of generic HRQoL after septorhinoplasty, Bulut et al found an improvement in six SF-36 domains: physical functioning, physical limitation, pain, energy, social functioning and well-being, but not on general Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Changes after Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study with Long-Term Results

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To investigate changes in specific generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) domains achieved by rhinoplasty. To investigate if modifications of somatic-, psychologic- and social-related HRQoL domains are different in patients with functional or aesthetic motivation for rhinoplasty. To investigate if HRQoL changes are related to a functional or to an aesthetic nasal improvement. Study design: Prospective study with one year of follow-up. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive Caucasian patients submitted to rhinoplasty were evaluated with 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EuroQuality-of-Life 5 Domain (EQ-5D) questionnaires. To correlate changes in generic HRQoL with functional and aesthetic modifications achieved by rhinoplasty, evaluation of patients also included assessment of Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, Visual Analogue Scale for nasal airway obstruction (NAO), and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation scores. Modifications in each generic HRQoL health-domain were analyzed to investigate possible relation with motivation for surgery and with functional or aesthetic improvement. Results: There was a significant improvement in EQ-5D (p<0.001), EQ-5D VAS (p=0.002) and in the SF-36 domains of General Health (p<0.001), Energy (p<0.001), Physical Functioning (p<0.001), Physical Limitation (p=0.005), Pain (p=0.003) and Well-Being (p=0.018). Improvement was significant in groups of patients with NAO or in whom a septoplasty was performed and was associated with patient-reported functional improvement. There was a significant improvement in Health Change (p<0.001), verified in all groups of patients. Conclusions: This prospective study with long-term results demonstrates that rhinoplasty significantly improves most domains of generic HRQoL. This improvement is associated with patient-reported functional improvement. Emotional Limitation and Social Functioning are not significantly changed by rhinoplasty.

show abstract

“…10 If BDD and other psychopathology are ruled out, the patient can then be counseled regarding surgery; however, if the surgeon still has significant concerns it may be necessary to get a second opinion. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Cosmetic procedures screening scale 21 Derriford appearance scale (DAS59) 18,22,23 Expectations of esthetic rhinoplasty scale (EARS) 24 Body dysmorphic disorder questionnaire (BDDQ) 25 Brief fear of negative evaluation scale 25 The Utrecht questionnaire for outcome assessment in esthetic rhinoplasty 26 Yale-Brown obsessive scale modified for BDD 22 Hospital anxiety and depression scale 26 The RHINO scale 27 Dysmorphic concern questionnaire 28 Glasgow benefit inventory 23,[29][30][31][32][33] FACE-Q 20,[34][35][36][37][38][39] Neuroticism-extraversion-openness fivefactor inventory (NEO-FFI) 40 Body dysmorphic disorder examinationself report (BDDE-SR) 41 Symptom checklist-90-revised (SCL-90-R) 40 Determining preoperative expectations is crucial as poor outcomes are more frequently due to emotional dissatisfaction rather than technical failure. 42,43 The use of the rhinoplasty improvement scale is helpful in counseling patients about realistic postsurgical expectations; moving up one point on the scale is realistic but anything more than this is unlikely (Fig.…”

Section: Ijhnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment and the Psychological Aspects for Septorhinoplasty

Saleh¹,

Rennie²

2018

International Journal of Head and Neck Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article the authors discuss the assessment of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty emphasing the importance of psychological assessement in the preoperative work up. Patients motivations, anxieties and expectations are reviewed, key points to help identify problem patients are highlighted and specific questions to identfy those that may be suffering BDD are recommended. Facial proportions and the ideal angles of the facial esthetic triangle are described. A framework is presented to enable systematic analysis and examination of the face and nose to promote appropriate patient selection and facilitate surgical planning.

show abstract

Quality of life of patients who underwent aesthetic rhinoplasty: 100 cases assessed with the Glascow Benefit Inventory

Abstract: 2c Laryngoscope, 127:2017-2025, 2017.

Cited by 14 publications

References 26 publications

Comparison of emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and control group

Comparison of emotional intelligence, body image, and quality of life between rhinoplasty candidates and control group

Generic Health-Related Quality-of-Life Changes after Rhinoplasty: A Prospective Study with Long-Term Results

Assessment and the Psychological Aspects for Septorhinoplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About