Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study

Kunze, Kyle N.; Krivicich, Laura M.; Verma, Nikhil N.; Chahla, Jorge

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033

Cited by 115 publications

(173 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

152

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although several studies generated content scores, as well as GQS or JAMAS, to evaluate quality, the multiple score analyzing in this study supported and enhanced the impact of each scoring system for the term AIDR. 10,15,17,19 The interobserver agreement results in our study are also of great importance.…”

Section: Ta B L Esupporting

confidence: 56%

“…11,18 JAMAS and mGQS are validated quality assessment tools that are preferred for being reproducible. 19 The impact of this article is based mainly on using multiple scoring scales for assessing reliability (DISCERN) and quality (JAMAS, GQS, and TCE). As well as determining accurate reliability, 3 scales for quality proved and reinforced consistent results.…”

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Aydın

Güneç

2020

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study was designed to investigate Artificial Intelligence in Dental Radiology (AIDR) videos on YouTube in terms of popularity, content, reliability, and educational quality. Methods: Two researchers systematically searched about AIDR on YouTube on January 27, 2020, by using the terms "artificial intelligence in dental radiology," "machine learning in dental radiology," and "deep learning in dental radiology." The search was performed in English, and 60 videos for each keyword were assessed. Video source, content type, time since upload, duration, and number of views, likes, and dislikes were recorded. Video popularity was reported using Video Power Index (VPI). The accuracy and reliability of the source of information were measured using the adapted DISCERN score. The quality of the videos was measured using JAMAS and modified Global Quality Score (mGQS) and content via Total Concent Evaluation (TCE). Results: There was high interobserver agreement for DISCERN (intraclass cor

show abstract

Section: Ta B L Esupporting

confidence: 56%

Section: Ta B L Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Aydın

Güneç

2020

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The JAMA Benchmark Criteria consists of four components (Authorship, Attribution, Currency, Disclosure) with one point assigned for the presence of each component ( Table 2 ) [ 27 ]. This instrument has been used in multiple previous studies investigating the quality of online health information [ 20 , [28] , [29] , [30] ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modern Internet Search Analytics and Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Are Patients Asking and Reading Online?

Shen

Driscoll

Islam

et al. 2021

The Journal of Arthroplasty

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Patients considering total joint arthroplasty often search for information online regarding surgery, however little is known about the specific topics that patients search for and the nature of the information provided. Google compiles frequently asked questions associated with a search term using machine learning and natural language processing. Links to individual websites are provided to answer each question. Analysis of this data may help improve understanding of patient concerns and inform more effective counseling. Methods Search terms were entered into Google for total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Frequently asked questions and associated websites were extracted to a database using customized software. Questions were categorized by topic; websites were categorized by type. JAMA Benchmark Criteria were used to assess website quality. Pearson’s chi-square and Student’s t-tests were performed as appropriate. Results A total of 620 questions (305 TKA, 315 THA) were extracted with 602 associated websites. The most popular question topics were Specific Activities (23.5%), Indications/Management (15.6%), and Restrictions (13.4%). Questions related to Pain were more common in the TKA group (23.0% vs 2.5%, p<0.001) compared to THA. The most common website types were Academic (31.1%), Commercial (29.2%), and Social Media (17.1%). JAMA scores (0-4) were highest for Government websites (mean 3.92, p=0.005). Conclusion The most frequently asked questions on Google related to total joint arthroplasty are related to arthritis management, rehabilitation, and ability to perform specific tasks. A sizeable proportion of health information provided originate from non-academic, non-government sources (64.4%), with 17.1% from social media websites.

show abstract

“…The majority of studies that have investigated the ability to provide high-quality medical information have highlighted this shortcoming and reported that YouTube provides poorquality information for their specific medical discipline or topic of interest. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Although the majority of these studies only analyze a limited subset of these videos out of an extensive selection, the consistency in findings is supporting evidence of this trend. In the defense of YouTube, it is unlikely that its creators established this platform with the use of conveying accurate and reliable medical information in mind.…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

“…3 Although YouTube is accessed for a variety of reasons, procuring information as it relates to health information is a major use. [4][5][6] Despite the potential benefits of providing health information on a video-sharing platform that is freely accessible to patients, the majority of literature on the topic has suggested that YouTube is everything but appropriate to this end. In their article entitled "YouTube Videos Provide Poor Information Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Regarding Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," Springer, Bechler, Koller, Windhager, and Waldstein investigated the quality and reliability of YouTube videos pertaining to rehabilitation and return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial Commentary: YouTube Videos Provide Poor-Quality Medical Information: Don’t Believe What You Watch!

Kunze¹

2020

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Providing accurate information to patients regarding health conditions, treatment options, and prognosis is a crucial aspect of medical management and an ethical obligation. Office visits may be limited due to time constraints imposed by scheduling, which may result in missed opportunities to provide extensive information when history, physical examination, review of diagnostic testing, and planning is required. As the Internet is now an established platform and easily accessible, patients are increasingly seeking information from websites out of curiosity and for additional questions pertaining to their health condition. However, the reliability and accuracy of anterior cruciate ligament videos on YouTube are of evidence-based very low quality and reliability.

show abstract

Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study

Cited by 115 publications

References 16 publications

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology

Modern Internet Search Analytics and Total Joint Arthroplasty: What Are Patients Asking and Reading Online?

Editorial Commentary: YouTube Videos Provide Poor-Quality Medical Information: Don’t Believe What You Watch!

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About