2004
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2004.1284928
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of service for networked virtual environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, at the end-user level the QoS maps some subjective features like immersion, presence and comfort to measurable values. At the physical layer level, the QoS describes characteristics such as the bit error rate for a transmission link [15]. At the application level, the Web service QoS requirements define availability, accessibility, integrity, performance (measured in terms of throughput and latency), reliability, regularity and security [16].…”
Section: Quality Of Service For Remote Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, at the end-user level the QoS maps some subjective features like immersion, presence and comfort to measurable values. At the physical layer level, the QoS describes characteristics such as the bit error rate for a transmission link [15]. At the application level, the Web service QoS requirements define availability, accessibility, integrity, performance (measured in terms of throughput and latency), reliability, regularity and security [16].…”
Section: Quality Of Service For Remote Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivering network performance in real-time groupware is a difficult task due to the diverse performance needs of the applications, and the situational factors that affect performance requirements [7]. There are many different genres of groupware (including games, whiteboards, conferencing systems, shared editors, virtual classrooms, and collaborative virtual environments), and each application can have multiple interaction techniques with diverse quality of service requirements.…”
Section: Groupware Network Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…need only implement up to the Network layer. In order to provide end-to-end QoS, there must be QoS mapping across layers and QoS concatenation along intermediate nodes as described by Gracanin et al (2004). QoS needs to be implemented along the whole dotted line of figure 3(a), since one missing link could prove to be enough of a bottleneck to spoil QoS efforts in other parts of the system.…”
Section: Prior Work and Applicable Qos Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this pattern, each node in the path will become a client for the following node, which will apply its own independent admission control policy based on its current QoS measurements. Once an end-to-end flow is established, the QoS offered to the channel results in the concatenation of the QoS provided by each node, which in this case results in the addition of the individual predicted delays (Gracanin et al 2004).…”
Section: Multi-hop Admission Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation