2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-218-4_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of Service in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answers to these questions were obtained through the assessment of the metrics defined for the controlled experiment (see Sect. 3 …”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The answers to these questions were obtained through the assessment of the metrics defined for the controlled experiment (see Sect. 3 …”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, in one of our previous works we managed to add to ArchWiSeN a "Network Energy Consumption Analyzer" [35] that estimates the usage of power of a node and provides such information to the developers where they can compare the obtained information with the application requirements in early stages of development. Data accuracy is a property that corresponds to the precision of the reported phenomena and is very important in domains where data precision is a required quality of service attribute [3]. The precision of the data obtained through a sensor can be determined by the sensor chip inherent characteristics, and thus, it is An approach based on the domain perspective to develop WSAN applications a non-functional requirement that limits the number of target hardware and is defined at the structural view.…”
Section: Platform-independent Meta-modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several efforts specific to wireless sensor networks (WSN) have appeared in the literature [4][6][8] [9]. The focus of these efforts is to understand and model the network communication characteristics of a WSN to define the corresponding network level QoS.…”
Section: Multidimensional Qos Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the performance of SES, we have chosen different metrics of interest, which are usually observed in studies of reference such as Basaran 2009) with the objective of analyzing the behavior/quality of the end-to-end communications. The simulation results shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5 are throughput (bandwidth utilization), latency (average delay), jitter (average deviation from the messages latency), message 2012, 2012:198 Page 8 of 23 http://jis.eurasipjournals.com/content/2012/1/198 delivery ratio (percentage of messages delivered at sink successfully), and a routing-node lifetime achieved from 40 independent simulations (95% confidence intervals).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Sesmentioning
confidence: 99%