2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of web-based information on cocaine addiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
38
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
38
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contradiction with the results of previous studies on depression-related [10,[12][13][14] and health-related websites, [9,19,20,24] the content quality of depression-related websites was found to be good (score 20.33/28: higher than 14, the mean score for minimal and mostly correct information). This result is quite similar to the results recently found for bipolar disorder websites, [21] which can partially be explained by the fact that the websites analyzed in our study partially overlap with those analyzed in the bipolar disorder study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contradiction with the results of previous studies on depression-related [10,[12][13][14] and health-related websites, [9,19,20,24] the content quality of depression-related websites was found to be good (score 20.33/28: higher than 14, the mean score for minimal and mostly correct information). This result is quite similar to the results recently found for bipolar disorder websites, [21] which can partially be explained by the fact that the websites analyzed in our study partially overlap with those analyzed in the bipolar disorder study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with the results of some studies, [20,21,32] but in accord with others, [19,33] the HON label was positively associated with content quality. The discrepancy among these studies may be due to the relatively small number of sites with the HON label, to the criteria used by the HON label (more related to ethical considerations than to content quality), and to the fact that this label is only given upon site request.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Greenfi eld and colleagues (2005) tested the readability of patient handouts in a random sample of SUD treatment programs in the United States and found an average readability level of 11.8 (i.e., nearly equivalent to 12th grade). Studies by Khazaal and colleagues found that Internet-based information on alcohol (Khazaal et al, 2010) and cocaine dependence (Khazaal et al, 2008) was written at an average reading-grade level of 11.5 and 10.5, respectively. Thus, there is a large gap between the reading-grade level of patients and the readability of written materials that are provided in these programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%