2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2013.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantiferon vs. tuberculin testing in detection of latent tuberculous infection among chronic renal failure patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Hussein et al [33] demonstrated that the prevalence of LTBI changed significantly according to the adopted diagnostic method, with 13.5% using the TST and 35.1% using QFT-GIT. The results of most studies in Saudi Arabia [34,47,48], Egypt [33,42], and Turkey [19,36,[38][39][40] corroborated that using IGRA tools allows the better detection of LTBI among HD patients. On the other hand, only three studies conducted in Egypt, Iran, and Turkey [32,37,43] showed discordant data, with a higher LTBI prevalence using the TST compared to IGRA tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In addition, Hussein et al [33] demonstrated that the prevalence of LTBI changed significantly according to the adopted diagnostic method, with 13.5% using the TST and 35.1% using QFT-GIT. The results of most studies in Saudi Arabia [34,47,48], Egypt [33,42], and Turkey [19,36,[38][39][40] corroborated that using IGRA tools allows the better detection of LTBI among HD patients. On the other hand, only three studies conducted in Egypt, Iran, and Turkey [32,37,43] showed discordant data, with a higher LTBI prevalence using the TST compared to IGRA tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%