2011
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification noise in single cell experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted June 9, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.138206 doi: bioRxiv preprint was defined as the point at which there was a 95% replication rate (35 Ct) (Reiter et al, 2011).…”
Section: Single Cell Amplification and Qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint (which this version posted June 9, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.06.138206 doi: bioRxiv preprint was defined as the point at which there was a 95% replication rate (35 Ct) (Reiter et al, 2011).…”
Section: Single Cell Amplification and Qpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain scientific experiments, the signal to noise ratio can be extremely low. This is especially the case in some experiments of physics 20,21 , social science 22,23 and biological science [24][25][26] . Thus we also tested our model under noise level of 200% (signal to noise ratio 1:2), 500% (signal to noise ratio 1:5) and 1000% (signal to noise ratio 1:10).…”
Section: Evaluating the Contextual Regression Model On Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cycle time (Ct) values were determined via regression. Quantification threshold for PCR 151 was defined as the point at which there was a 95% replication rate (35 Ct) (Reiter et al, 2011). 152…”
Section: Single Cell Amplification and Qpcr 145mentioning
confidence: 99%