2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of applied dose in irradiated citrus fruits by DNA Comet Assay together with image analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the in vivo studies also used cells obtained from a numerous different species including mainly rat, fish, mouse and worm. Some few studies also investigated DNA damage in bacteria (Danevcic et al 2016), plant cells (Cetinkaya et al 2016;Faisal et al 2016;Lanier et al 2015), amoebae (Kusrini et al 2016) or hydra (Zeeshan et al 2016). Whereas in the in vitro studies, a wide range of cell types belonging to different organ systems (e.g., A549, HCT 116, HEPG2, MCF-7, MRC-5, BEAS-2B, CHO-K1, and HEK293) were used, the in vivo studies were mainly based on cells from the blood system (about 61 %) like erythrocytes obtained from, e.g., fish or lymphocytes from, e.g., humans.…”
Section: Current Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the in vivo studies also used cells obtained from a numerous different species including mainly rat, fish, mouse and worm. Some few studies also investigated DNA damage in bacteria (Danevcic et al 2016), plant cells (Cetinkaya et al 2016;Faisal et al 2016;Lanier et al 2015), amoebae (Kusrini et al 2016) or hydra (Zeeshan et al 2016). Whereas in the in vitro studies, a wide range of cell types belonging to different organ systems (e.g., A549, HCT 116, HEPG2, MCF-7, MRC-5, BEAS-2B, CHO-K1, and HEK293) were used, the in vivo studies were mainly based on cells from the blood system (about 61 %) like erythrocytes obtained from, e.g., fish or lymphocytes from, e.g., humans.…”
Section: Current Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Alternatively, comets can be analyzed based on computer image analysis. 22,23 Image analysis systems for comet evaluation potentially strengthen the method by avoiding individual analyzer variation, 22 mostly for unexperienced laboratories and for very low irradiation doses (e.g., 0.1 kGy used to inhibit sprouting of potatoes, onions, and garlic). 24 Also, they allow fully quantitative discrimination between irradiated and nonirradiated samples, as well as they are able to set up standard dose-response curves, resulting in sufficiently accurate dose estimations.…”
Section: Detection Of Irradiated Foods By Biological Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HepG2 cells were collected after being treated by 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 μM Spinetoram for 12 h, then washed with PBS (pH 7.4) for 3 times to remove Spinetoram. After that, HepG2 cells were mixed with 1% agarose with low melting point at a ratio of 1:5 under 37°C to form monosuspension which was then cast upon the microscopic slide (Cetinkaya, Ercin, Özvatan, & Erel, 2016;Zhang, Luo, et al, 2016). The slide was rinsed by distilled water for 3 times after lysis, immersed in electrophoresis solution of ice alkaline (1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaOH, with pH of 13.0) at 4°C for 15 min, then the electrophoresis was performed at 20 V (1 V/ cm) or 300 mA for 20 min (Ghassemi-Barghi, Varshosaz, Etebari, & Dehkordi, 2016).…”
Section: Alkaline Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%