2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of blue carbon in seagrass ecosystems of Southeast Asia and their potential for climate change mitigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings agree with the previous studies and show that seagrass meadows of ANI have 66% higher carbon storage capacity at MG sites (272.54 ± 164 Mg C ha -1 ) and low at WMG sites (128.79 ± 55.89 Mg C ha -1 ). These differences in our study from Stankovic et al (2021) is probably because the authors derived the total carbon in the ecosystem through a model-based approach, whereas in our study, we have used the traditional methods of quantification recommended for blue carbon research (Howard et al, 2014). The total carbon stock in the T.…”
Section: Total Carbon In the Seagrass Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings agree with the previous studies and show that seagrass meadows of ANI have 66% higher carbon storage capacity at MG sites (272.54 ± 164 Mg C ha -1 ) and low at WMG sites (128.79 ± 55.89 Mg C ha -1 ). These differences in our study from Stankovic et al (2021) is probably because the authors derived the total carbon in the ecosystem through a model-based approach, whereas in our study, we have used the traditional methods of quantification recommended for blue carbon research (Howard et al, 2014). The total carbon stock in the T.…”
Section: Total Carbon In the Seagrass Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as these ecosystems are conserved or protected from anthropogenic disturbances, the blue carbon stored in their sediments can be stored safely for millenniums (Duarte et al 2005;Macreadie et al 2014). However, once destroyed, these ecosystems act as the source of carbon rather than sinks (Salinas et al 2020;Serrano et al 2020;Stankovic et al 2021). As a result, globally, the importance of blue carbon stored in seagrass ecosystems (19.9 Pg of Corg) has gained attention, and their utilization as a nature-based solution for climate change mitigation is gaining momentum (Stankovic et al, 2021;Macreadie et al, 2019;UNEP, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their value to society and the biosphere, blue carbon ecosystems are being lost -seagrass are being lost at a rate of 7% year −1 globally (Waycott et al, 2009), and mangroves are being lost at a rate of 1-3% year −1 globally (FAO, 2007) largely due to human stressors such as land use change (Goldberg et al, 2020). In Southeast Asia, seagrass loss is between 2.82% yr −1 (Stankovic et al, 2021) and 10.9% yr −1 (Sudo et al, 2021) due to coastal development, fisheries and storms. Philippine seagrasses have among the greatest extent in Southeast Asia at 2.7 million has (Fortes et al, 2018), but around 76,897 ha yr −1 is being lost (Stankovic et al, 2021), and in a single site, authors found a rate of decline of 1.7% year −1 (Blanco et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Southeast Asia, seagrass loss is between 2.82% yr −1 (Stankovic et al, 2021) and 10.9% yr −1 (Sudo et al, 2021) due to coastal development, fisheries and storms. Philippine seagrasses have among the greatest extent in Southeast Asia at 2.7 million has (Fortes et al, 2018), but around 76,897 ha yr −1 is being lost (Stankovic et al, 2021), and in a single site, authors found a rate of decline of 1.7% year −1 (Blanco et al, 2014). Thirty five percent of original Philippine mangroves were lost by the end of the 20th century (Valiela et al, 2001), and Philippine mangroves decreased by half from 1918-2010, declining at a rate of 10.5% from 1990 to 2010 (Long et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the conflicts on the land and resources uses with other economics and to reduce impacts on the environment, aquaculture does not only take place in inland and coastal waters but also expanding the offshore waters [3,4]. Aquaculture in inland and coastal waters has a limitation of spatial distribution, resources used conflicts, negative impacts ecosystems and degradation environment [3][4][5][6][7], whereas open/offshore mariculture (defined as the farming of marine organisms in offshore waters with less significant influence from coastal regions [8]) applies advanced technology to increase aquaculture production and to minimize the above limitations. However, open/offshore mariculture is still in the development and shaping stage, so it is necessary to develop standards for the open mariculture industry to ensure global sustainable development goals [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%