2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of chlorophyll-a in typical lakes across China using Sentinel-2 MSI imagery with machine learning algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For chl-a estimation, the model is based on the spectral inversion procedure, where the specific absorption spectra of phytoplankton are used for the calculation of the chl-a concentration (R 2 = 0.82). Recently, Li et al [28] proposed a machine learning method for the estimation of chl-a concentration from Sentinel-2 imagery in 45 Chinese lakes with trophy varying from oligotrophic to hypertrophic. The authors created three clusters of R rs and identified the best machine learning algorithms by testing linear regression model, support vector machine model and Catboost model for the estimation of chl-a and other water quality parameters for each cluster (R 2 = 0.50, 0.64 and 0.79 for clusters 1, 2 and 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For chl-a estimation, the model is based on the spectral inversion procedure, where the specific absorption spectra of phytoplankton are used for the calculation of the chl-a concentration (R 2 = 0.82). Recently, Li et al [28] proposed a machine learning method for the estimation of chl-a concentration from Sentinel-2 imagery in 45 Chinese lakes with trophy varying from oligotrophic to hypertrophic. The authors created three clusters of R rs and identified the best machine learning algorithms by testing linear regression model, support vector machine model and Catboost model for the estimation of chl-a and other water quality parameters for each cluster (R 2 = 0.50, 0.64 and 0.79 for clusters 1, 2 and 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of kernel is important with a level of impact on the model accuracy, however, might be a challenge because the work requires knowledge of expertise and practical experiences, and studies on the kernel performance are not frequently reported in the literature. With the advantages of nonlinear relationships quantification, well studied, and simplicity in model structure (Li et al, 2021), RBF is slightly better performance than the sigmoid kernel (Hong et al, 2017) and has been the selected kernel for SVM implementation in various studies with success (Li et al, 2018; Xie et al, 2012). Hence, the RBF kernel was used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method uses internal implicit networks and structures to determine the complex characteristics of input data and obtain explicit relationships among the output variables [12,13]. Several approaches, including the decision tree [12,14], BP neural network [15,16], support vector machine model (SVM) [17,18], and extreme machine learning approaches [19], have strong adaptability, fault tolerance, and organization of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%