2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(2006)132:3(264)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Costs for Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Construction Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It causes an impact on the main project components such as cost, time and quality of construction projects [19]. Dispute is commonly known as an endemic and chronic character of construction industry [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It causes an impact on the main project components such as cost, time and quality of construction projects [19]. Dispute is commonly known as an endemic and chronic character of construction industry [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used this DSS in different articles (Kassab et al 2010(Kassab et al , 2011Hipel et al 2011). Gebken and Gibson (2006) proposed a dispute resolution framework based upon the concepts of risk management. Chan et al (2006) presented a dispute resolution selection model based on AHP and MAUT.…”
Section: Dispute Resolution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the dispute cannot be settled amicably, the parties can go to court or consider other dispute settlement procedures such as mediation, conciliation, etc. Recently, in countries of both general and continental traditions of law one can note increasingly active interest of researchers in alternative methods of dispute resolution (Bingham 2002;Chan and Suen 2005;Koolwijk 2006;Gebken and Gibson 2006;Gabuthy et al 2008;Ma et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%