Quartz Cementation in Sandstones 2000
DOI: 10.1002/9781444304237.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Detrital, Authigenic and Porosity Components of the Fontainebleau Sandstone: A Comparison of Conventional Optical and Combined Scanning Electron Microscope‐Based Methods of Modal Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inherited quartz overgrowths, particularly those enclosed by subsequent euhedral overgrowths (Figure 5d), are easily overlooked and misinterpreted as in situ cement by optical microscope analysis alone unless dust rims are present (e.g. Austin, 1974; Basu et al., 2013; Burley et al., 1989; Cooper et al., 2000). Regardless of whether dust rims are present or not, SEM RGB (coloured) CL imaging can be used to differentiate multiple quartz overgrowths from each other (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherited quartz overgrowths, particularly those enclosed by subsequent euhedral overgrowths (Figure 5d), are easily overlooked and misinterpreted as in situ cement by optical microscope analysis alone unless dust rims are present (e.g. Austin, 1974; Basu et al., 2013; Burley et al., 1989; Cooper et al., 2000). Regardless of whether dust rims are present or not, SEM RGB (coloured) CL imaging can be used to differentiate multiple quartz overgrowths from each other (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the eight sandstones, total volumes of quartz, porosity, non-quartz minerals, and quartz cement were quantified using a combination of back-scattered electron (BSE) and cathodoluminescence (SEM-CL) microscopy using a Philips/FEI XL30 Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope-Field Emission Gun (XL30 ESEM-FEG). Image analysis was carried out according to methods described by Evans et al (1994) and Cooper et al (2000). The average grain size was determined by measuring the long axis of 100 randomly selected, non-ductile detrital grains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a comparatively fast process that utilizes easily available publicdomain image analysis software and equipment (e.g., electron microprobe or SEM) that is routinely available in modern research facilities. The study is chiefly concerned with the possibility of evaluating the effects of diagenesis on reservoir quality using digital image analysis (Bryant et al 1993;Cooper et al 2000;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%