2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of environmental-economic trade-offs in nutrient management policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil application of N was reported to effectively increase YANs in grapevine berries [10,11], but this strategy can be expensive with serious economic and environmentally negative consequences [12]. Since the pollution related to N fertilization represents a main environmental concern in many cropping systems around the world [13], research into efficient and environmentally friendly fertilization strategies represents the main goal of many growers, extension specialists, scientists as well as in agricultural governmental policies [14][15][16]. Foliar application of N is generally considered more environmentally friendly compared to soil application because it directly targets the plant [17][18][19] reducing the risk of nitrate leaching [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil application of N was reported to effectively increase YANs in grapevine berries [10,11], but this strategy can be expensive with serious economic and environmentally negative consequences [12]. Since the pollution related to N fertilization represents a main environmental concern in many cropping systems around the world [13], research into efficient and environmentally friendly fertilization strategies represents the main goal of many growers, extension specialists, scientists as well as in agricultural governmental policies [14][15][16]. Foliar application of N is generally considered more environmentally friendly compared to soil application because it directly targets the plant [17][18][19] reducing the risk of nitrate leaching [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants believed there are societal shifts in expectations for the pastoral farming sector generally. These include the adoption of sustainability and animal welfare measures which can be market driven (Lyons & Lawrence, 2017), or come from government agencies through regulation and policy (Kaye-Blake et al, 2019), subsidies (Gołębiewska & Pajewski, 2018Pajewski et al, 2020) and taxation shifts (Barrett & Makale, 2019). A mix of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations like these are expected to drive farmer efforts to reduce their environmental footprint.…”
Section: Social Licensementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased nitrogen concentrations and loads in Southland rivers have been linked to declining water quality (Hamill and McBride 2003 ; Monaghan et al 2007 ), and consequent eutrophication of rivers and estuaries (Stevens et al 2022 ). There remains significant potential for agricultural intensification (Kaye-Blake et al 2019 ), which would almost certainly be associated with increased nitrogen loss (Vogeler et al 2014 ; Vibart et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%