2017
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.17-0116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Etoposide Hypersensitivity: A Sensitive, Functional Method for Assessing Pluripotent Stem Cell Quality

Abstract: Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) hold great promise in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. However, translation of hiPSC technology depends upon a means of assessing hiPSC quality that is quantitative, high-throughput, and can decipher malignant teratocarcinoma clones from normal cell lines. These attributes are lacking in current approaches such as detection of cell surface makers, RNA profiling, and/or teratoma formation assays. The latter remains the gold standard for assessing clone qualit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, if cells are still at an early-differentiated progenitor state, it is mandatory, from a safety viewpoint, to eliminate those that have retained their pluripotency. This objective can be achieved by a variety of techniques including chemical inhibitors (such as etoposide), which exploit the sensitivity of PSCs to genotoxic agents (Secreto et al, 2017), small molecule-based induction of PSC apoptosis (Ben-David et al, 2013), recombinant lectin-toxin fusion proteins selectively binding to PSCs and delivering a cytotoxic cargo following their internalization (Tateno et al, 2015), or, in the case of the heart, culture under glucose depletion and lactate enrichment to enhance the exclusive survival of differentiated cardiomyocytes (Tohyama et al, 2013) (for a more extensive review of the current methods of cardiomyocyte enrichment, see Ban et al, 2017). In the clinics, however, enrichment for a pure population of progenitor cells rather relies on antibody-based sorting targeting lineage-specific surface markers such as CD142 for pancreatic endoderm cells (Kelly et al, 2011), LR-TMP1 for midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Samata et al, 2016), or SSEA-1 for cardiovascular progenitors (Menasché et al, 2015).…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, if cells are still at an early-differentiated progenitor state, it is mandatory, from a safety viewpoint, to eliminate those that have retained their pluripotency. This objective can be achieved by a variety of techniques including chemical inhibitors (such as etoposide), which exploit the sensitivity of PSCs to genotoxic agents (Secreto et al, 2017), small molecule-based induction of PSC apoptosis (Ben-David et al, 2013), recombinant lectin-toxin fusion proteins selectively binding to PSCs and delivering a cytotoxic cargo following their internalization (Tateno et al, 2015), or, in the case of the heart, culture under glucose depletion and lactate enrichment to enhance the exclusive survival of differentiated cardiomyocytes (Tohyama et al, 2013) (for a more extensive review of the current methods of cardiomyocyte enrichment, see Ban et al, 2017). In the clinics, however, enrichment for a pure population of progenitor cells rather relies on antibody-based sorting targeting lineage-specific surface markers such as CD142 for pancreatic endoderm cells (Kelly et al, 2011), LR-TMP1 for midbrain dopaminergic neurons (Samata et al, 2016), or SSEA-1 for cardiovascular progenitors (Menasché et al, 2015).…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%