2021
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of increased MUC5AC expression in airway mucus of smoker using an automated image‐based approach

Abstract: Microscopic analysis of mucus quantity and composition is crucial in research and diagnostics on muco-obstructive diseases. Currently used image-based methods are unable to extract concrete numeric values of mucosal proteins, especially on the expression of the key mucosal proteins MUC5AC and MUC5B. Since their levels increase under pathologic conditions such as extensive exposure to cigarette smoke, it is imperative to quantify them to improve treatment strategies of pulmonary diseases. This study presents a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, we evaluated expression levels of MUC5AC and MUC5B including their ratio using RT-qPCR and our recently developed image-based analysis approach to assess protein levels (Groiss et al, 2022). BMGLS application significantly reduced mRNA expression of both MUC5AC and MUC5B (Figure 6D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Next, we evaluated expression levels of MUC5AC and MUC5B including their ratio using RT-qPCR and our recently developed image-based analysis approach to assess protein levels (Groiss et al, 2022). BMGLS application significantly reduced mRNA expression of both MUC5AC and MUC5B (Figure 6D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NHBE cells were isolated as previously described (Groiss et al, 2022). Briefly, the tracheal tissue was washed in sterile 0.9% NaCl / 3% penicillin-streptomycin before mechanically removing soft tissue or lung parenchyma and incubation in MEM (Gibco) supplemented with 1x MycoZAP (Lonza), 1x Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Anti-Anti, Gibco), 40 μg/mL ticarcillin (Merck), 500 μg/mL dithiothreitol and 10 μg/mL DNase (in PBS) for 4h at 4 °C followed by incubation in the aforementioned medium supplemented with collagenase solution (185 U/ml collagenase type II, 2 mg/ml BSA, 0.5 mM calcium chloride, 1 U amino acids 100x, 5% FCS in DMEM) and 10 μg/ml DNase (Gibco) over night at room temperature (RT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we stimulated leukemic THP1 cells in comparison to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) derived from healthy individuals with LPS for activation, and exposed them to an EMF equivalent of 16.7 Hz at different flux densities of <50 µT (termed weak EMF in this study; wkEMF), <250 µT (moderate EMF; mdEMF) and <4.8 mT (strong EMF; stEMF). We first assessed stEMF-induced ROS generation on a single cell level using our expertise on automated image analysis [32] and evaluated cellular NAD(P)H levels. Next, we screened for transcriptional anti-oxidative and immune regulatory responses of which key hits were probed in detail for field strength dependent activation, alongside typical key players in anti-oxidative defense and pro-and anti-inflammatory signaling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%