2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of mesh induced anisotropy effects in the phase-field method

Abstract: Phase-field modelling is one of the most powerful techniques currently available for the simulation from first principles the time dependant evolution of complex solidification microstructures. However, unless care is taken the computational mesh used to solve the set of partial differential equations that result from the phase-field formulation of the solidification problem may introduce a stray, or implicit, anisotropy, which would be highly undesirable in quantitative calculations. In this paper we quantify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the application of standard second order central difference stencils for the calculation of first and second differentials, while a compact 9-point scheme has been used for Laplacian terms, in order to reduce the mesh induced [33] anisotropy. To ensure sufficient mesh resolution around the interface region and to handle the extreme multi-scale nature of the problem local mesh refinement (coarsening) is employed when the weighted sum of the gradients of φ, U and θ exceeds (falls below) some predefined value.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the application of standard second order central difference stencils for the calculation of first and second differentials, while a compact 9-point scheme has been used for Laplacian terms, in order to reduce the mesh induced [33] anisotropy. To ensure sufficient mesh resolution around the interface region and to handle the extreme multi-scale nature of the problem local mesh refinement (coarsening) is employed when the weighted sum of the gradients of φ, U and θ exceeds (falls below) some predefined value.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the implementation of most phase-field models, which use spatially second order difference approximations, here we have used fourth order approximations in order to capture any bias-field effects, which are themselves proposed to be spatially fourth order [17]. The first and second differentials are calculated using a (spatially) fourth order accurate 9-point stencil, while a compact, 17-point, fourth order stencil has been used for the Laplacian terms, compact stencils being superior in their ability to reduce the mesh induced [22] anisotropy. The stencils, and the weights associated with each point therein, are illustrated graphically in Fig.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the application of standard second order central difference stencils for the calculation of first and second differentials, while a compact 9-point scheme has been used for Laplacian terms, in order to reduce the mesh induced [15] anisotropy. To ensure sufficient mesh resolution around the interface region and to handle the multi-scale nature of the problem local mesh refinement (coarsening) is employed when the weighted sum of the gradients of φ and θ exceeds (falls below) some predefined value.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%