1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00329-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of mitral regurgitation by automated cardiac output measurement: experimental and clinical validation

Abstract: We determined that ACM is a feasible new method for quantifying LV outflow and inflow volume to measure MRV and that ACM automatically performs calculations that are equivalent to more time-consuming Doppler and 2D measurements. Additionally, ACM should improve MR quantification in routine clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ultrasonography, pulsed wave, continuous wave, power Doppler, ACM, and 3D reconstruction flow methods have been reported. [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][21][22][23][24] Most commonly, such flows are determined from pulsed wave Doppler velocity data obtained from the centerline of flow, and the cross-sectional area of the annulus or vessel at this point obtained from the diameter measured from 2D ultrasonographic imaging. This single pulsed wave Doppler sample volume does not allow estimation of a velocity profile across the entire flow area but, by virtue of the limited lateral resolution, nonetheless probably obtains the spatial mean velocity.…”
Section: Previous Echo Methods Of Estimating Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For ultrasonography, pulsed wave, continuous wave, power Doppler, ACM, and 3D reconstruction flow methods have been reported. [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][21][22][23][24] Most commonly, such flows are determined from pulsed wave Doppler velocity data obtained from the centerline of flow, and the cross-sectional area of the annulus or vessel at this point obtained from the diameter measured from 2D ultrasonographic imaging. This single pulsed wave Doppler sample volume does not allow estimation of a velocity profile across the entire flow area but, by virtue of the limited lateral resolution, nonetheless probably obtains the spatial mean velocity.…”
Section: Previous Echo Methods Of Estimating Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACM method assumes axisymmetric flow; i.e., velocity information from 1 cross section is assumed to represent the entire flow profile. 20,21,23 However, the spatial distribution of the flow velocity depends on many factors, including the size and geometry of the vessel or valve in question and the flow volume. In the clinical setting, flow profiles may differ between axes because of dynamic changes in heart and vessel shape and size during the cardiac cycle.…”
Section: Previous Echo Methods Of Estimating Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aortic outflow SV is calculated as CSA LVOT ×VTI LVOT . This method assumes that no aortic regurgitation is present and has been validated against other methods of MR quantification [20]. & Stress testing: In patients with chronic primary MR, exercise stress testing with Doppler echocardiography may be useful in asymptomatic patients with severe MR to establish symptom status and exercise capacity and in symptomatic patients where there is a discrepancy between symptoms and severity of MR at rest [9••].…”
Section: Transthoracic Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several echocardiographic applications have been proposed such as the quantification of aortic or mitral regurgitations [12][13][14][15]. Considering the difficulty to estimate pulmonary orifice area using conventional echocardiography, the aim of our prospective study was to validate the ACM method for the calculation of pulmonary output and the quantification of ICS in adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%