2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00441-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Strains Representing Distinct Genotypes and Isolated from Domestic and Wildlife Animal Species by Use of an Automatic Liquid Culture System

Abstract: bQuantification of 11 clinical strains of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis isolated from domestic (cattle, sheep, and goat) and wildlife (fallow deer, deer, wild boar, and bison) animal species in an automatic liquid culture system (Bactec MGIT 960) was accomplished. The strains were previously isolated and typed using IS1311 PCR followed by restriction endonuclease analysis (PCR-REA) into type C, S, or B. A strain-specific quantification curve was generated for each M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i.) was estimated as previously described 35 . The genotype T/T showed higher MAP uptake at 2 h p.i.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.) was estimated as previously described 35 . The genotype T/T showed higher MAP uptake at 2 h p.i.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is uncertain if differences exist between cattle and sheep strains of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis, especially since it has been reported that growth curves between S-type (sheep and goat) strains were dissimilar from those of C-type stains (cattle and bison) in liquid culture (28). Furthermore, the growth of sheep strains of M. avium subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assay was validated and optimized with a specific strain of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis and would need to be validated for use with other strains or sample types, as growth dynamics in culture may vary (35,36). Furthermore, macrophages may not kill bacteria but may cause growth suppression/ inhibition, which may not be distinguishable in the assay (28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%