1993
DOI: 10.1016/0141-5425(93)90013-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of soft-tissue imbalance in condylar knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, any inter-structure rheological effects can be assumed to be equal and opposite. Soft tissue imbalance has been defined in both extension and 90" of flexion as the geomeuy of the resultant trapezoid [16]. Soft tissue balance quantified in these terms should be quoted in conjunction with the angle of the femoral and tibia1 cuts, to allow the absolute comparison between patients.…”
Section: Design Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, any inter-structure rheological effects can be assumed to be equal and opposite. Soft tissue imbalance has been defined in both extension and 90" of flexion as the geomeuy of the resultant trapezoid [16]. Soft tissue balance quantified in these terms should be quoted in conjunction with the angle of the femoral and tibia1 cuts, to allow the absolute comparison between patients.…”
Section: Design Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies which investigated soft tissue balancing in TKA, quantifying gap kinematics between the femur and the tibia using a tensor device, have been published [3,12,22,25,28]. However, gap kinematics using a tensor device in UKA has not been well reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second generation of tensor devices which were quantitatively applied and objective with the measurement under fixed torque or load were commercially available [16][17][18][19][20] or individually developed or modified [21][22][23][24]. Using the tensor, the following parameters can be calculated from the values: joint component gap (joint center gap) and varus ligament balance (varus angle) (Fig 2).…”
Section: Traditional Soft Tissue Balance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%