2017
DOI: 10.3791/56212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the Abundance and Charging Levels of Transfer RNAs in <em>Escherichia coli</em>

Abstract: Transfer RNA (tRNA) is an essential part of the translational machinery in any organism. tRNAs bind and transfer amino acids to the translating ribosome. The relative levels of different tRNAs, and the ratio of aminoacylated tRNA to total tRNA, known as the charging level, are important factors in determining the accuracy and speed of translation. Therefore, the abundance and charging levels of tRNAs are important variables to measure when studying protein synthesis, for example under various stress conditions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we used a method relying on the addition of spike‐in cells expressing high amounts of a reference RNA to accurately quantify bacterial RNA content. The advantage of the spike‐in method is that it allows for normalization of sample signals, which is required to reduce noise caused by variations in RNA recovery and blotting, without making assumptions about the existence of an invariable endogenous reference RNA or invariable total RNA contents of the cells, before and after starvation (Sorensen, Fehler, & Svenningsen, ; Stenum, Sorensen, & Svenningsen, ; Svenningsen et al, ). Although RNA was extracted with hot phenol (see Experimental Procedures), which efficiently disrupts gram‐negative bacterial membranes (Ares, ), recovery of RNA from starved cells could be reduced compared to growing cells due to physiological changes of the cell envelope and size of the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we used a method relying on the addition of spike‐in cells expressing high amounts of a reference RNA to accurately quantify bacterial RNA content. The advantage of the spike‐in method is that it allows for normalization of sample signals, which is required to reduce noise caused by variations in RNA recovery and blotting, without making assumptions about the existence of an invariable endogenous reference RNA or invariable total RNA contents of the cells, before and after starvation (Sorensen, Fehler, & Svenningsen, ; Stenum, Sorensen, & Svenningsen, ; Svenningsen et al, ). Although RNA was extracted with hot phenol (see Experimental Procedures), which efficiently disrupts gram‐negative bacterial membranes (Ares, ), recovery of RNA from starved cells could be reduced compared to growing cells due to physiological changes of the cell envelope and size of the cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 To assess whether PAP I is necessary for the general tRNA decay in the early response to amino acid starvation, we measured tRNA levels in a rph + derivative of MG1655 and the isogenic ΔpcnB strain, using the method described previously. 14,21 Fig. 1 shows that all measured tRNA half-lives during starvation for isoleucine were unaffected by the absence of PAP I.…”
Section: Effectors Of Trna Degradationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…14,21 By quantifying a reference RNA that is highly expressed in the spike-in cells and either absent or present at very low levels in the experimental samples, it is possible to obtain accurate normalization by adding only a small aliquot of spike-in cells to the experimental samples. We typically add 1–5% spike-in cells to each sample (based on optical density), and load a control sample containing only spike-in cells to quantify the contribution of the spike-in cells to the signal from the RNA of interest.…”
Section: The Important Choice Of a Standard For Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations