2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of the influence of NO2, NO and CO gases on the determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde using the DNPH method as applied to polluted environments

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Quantification of the influence of NO2, NO and CO gases on the determination of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde using the DNPH method as applied to polluted environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as described in Figure 5f, a HPLC technique was adopted as a quick evaluation approach through the in situ derivation of a carbonyl compound (i.e., HCHO) using a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridge. [ 52 ] In general, the quantification of carbonyl compounds is accessible in the form of a non‐polar DNPH compound (HCHO‐DNP, ≈200 g mol −1 ) for the detection of low molecular weight aldehyde (≈30 g mol −1 ); [ 53,54 ] in this analytical method, acetonitrile was used as a compatible phase solvent that has the same retention time. Figure 5g shows a diagram of the HPLC chromatogram for the chemical separation facilitated by the MIP surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, as described in Figure 5f, a HPLC technique was adopted as a quick evaluation approach through the in situ derivation of a carbonyl compound (i.e., HCHO) using a 2,4‐dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) cartridge. [ 52 ] In general, the quantification of carbonyl compounds is accessible in the form of a non‐polar DNPH compound (HCHO‐DNP, ≈200 g mol −1 ) for the detection of low molecular weight aldehyde (≈30 g mol −1 ); [ 53,54 ] in this analytical method, acetonitrile was used as a compatible phase solvent that has the same retention time. Figure 5g shows a diagram of the HPLC chromatogram for the chemical separation facilitated by the MIP surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPLC based on hydrazine derivatization is the most frequently used method, as the detection limit is exceedingly low (3 nM). However, the hydrazine agents may also react with NO, NO 2 in air, and other aldehydes, decreasing the accuracy and selectivity for HCHO quantification [115] …”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formaldehyde can be analysed by different methods. The firsts correspond to the reference method(s) widely used to quantify airborne formaldehyde levels and involve a passive or active sampling of gaseous formaldehyde on a DNPH tube [23][24][25] for several hours or even several days to produce the corresponding hydrazone followed by off-line laboratory HLPC/UV analysis [26][27][28][29]. If this analytical approach is time-consuming, the quantification is very simple since it only requires the calibration of the HPLC with the appropriate range of hydrazone solutions and sampling means, i.e., the gas flow rate for an active sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%