2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification, removal and potential ecological risk of emerging contaminants in different organic loads of swine wastewater treated by integrated biological reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to comply with the current requirements regarding the discharge of treated effluents, this would guarantee an effective control of effluents. Figure 2 (de Oliveira et al, 2020, Mohapatra et al, 2019 illustrates the development of effective techniques for the advanced treatment of effluents contaminated with particulate matter (EPs). These techniques include physico-chemical and biological processes, such as sand and media filtration, chlorination, advanced oxidation processes, AOPs, adsorption using granular activated carbon, zeolite, or other clay materials, hydrolysis processes, constructed wetland (CW), membrane bioreactors, phytoremediation, and biosorption.…”
Section: The Removal Of Eps From the Environment As A Risk Mitigation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to comply with the current requirements regarding the discharge of treated effluents, this would guarantee an effective control of effluents. Figure 2 (de Oliveira et al, 2020, Mohapatra et al, 2019 illustrates the development of effective techniques for the advanced treatment of effluents contaminated with particulate matter (EPs). These techniques include physico-chemical and biological processes, such as sand and media filtration, chlorination, advanced oxidation processes, AOPs, adsorption using granular activated carbon, zeolite, or other clay materials, hydrolysis processes, constructed wetland (CW), membrane bioreactors, phytoremediation, and biosorption.…”
Section: The Removal Of Eps From the Environment As A Risk Mitigation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would ensure an efficient management of effluents developed to comply with the regulations in force on the discharge of treated effluents. In this context, efficient methods for advanced treatment of effluents polluted with EPs are developed, which include physico-chemical and biological processes (sand and media filtration; chlorination; advanced oxidation processes, AOPs; adsorption using granular activated carbon, zeolite or other clay materials; hydrolysis processes; constructed wetland (CW); membrane bioreactors, phytoremediation, biosorption), as illustrated in Figure 7 [93][94][95]. The application of activated sludge process to remove emerging pollutants is usually recommended to reduce high organic loads, but it is not suitable for removing EPs, especially at very low concentrations or traces of pollutants [96].…”
Section: Short Analysis Of Processes Applied For Eps' Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The world's population growth is contributing to a high demand in the food market [1][2][3]. Since pork meat is the second most consumed meat, the swine industry is growing quickly [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%