2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20056-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying accuracy and heterogeneity in single-molecule super-resolution microscopy

Abstract: The resolution and accuracy of single-molecule localization microscopes (SMLMs) are routinely benchmarked using simulated data, calibration rulers, or comparisons to secondary imaging modalities. However, these methods cannot quantify the nanoscale accuracy of an arbitrary SMLM dataset. Here, we show that by computing localization stability under a well-chosen perturbation with accurate knowledge of the imaging system, we can robustly measure the confidence of individual localizations without ground-truth know… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S5, S6) to optimize their concentrations for the analysis of MNPs @ SiO 2 (RITC) with d STORM imaging. Because NPs are not reagents to which specific antibodies are bound or stained for specific organelles in cells, the optimization of the concentration of NPs was determined through intuitive characterization rather than localization density [ 48 ]. At a higher concentration (0.1 μg/mL), RAW 264.7 cells demonstrated the uptake of numerous NPs, making the task of distinguishing individual NPs difficult in practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5, S6) to optimize their concentrations for the analysis of MNPs @ SiO 2 (RITC) with d STORM imaging. Because NPs are not reagents to which specific antibodies are bound or stained for specific organelles in cells, the optimization of the concentration of NPs was determined through intuitive characterization rather than localization density [ 48 ]. At a higher concentration (0.1 μg/mL), RAW 264.7 cells demonstrated the uptake of numerous NPs, making the task of distinguishing individual NPs difficult in practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, previous correlative AFM and fluorescence imaging of amyloids has revealed strong heterogeneity in labelling, [25,36] which can be topography‐dependent and likely due to high polymorphism in amyloids [25] . Furthermore, the interaction and binding orientations to the amyloid fibrils has recently been shown to affect the quality of SMLM reconstructed images [37] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] Furthermore, the interaction and binding orientations to the amyloid fibrils has recently been shown to affect the quality of SMLM reconstructed images. [37]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, to compensate for optical aberrations, we used images of bright fluorescent beads and a maximum-likelihood estimator to retrieve the pupil phase function, as reported in 23,78 . In short, optical aberrations were modeled as a phase mask at the pupil consisting of the sum of Zernike modes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%