2016
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying and correcting for scat removal in noninvasive carnivore scat surveys

Abstract: Scat surveys are commonly used to monitor wildlife populations. For carnivores, surveys are typically conducted along roads and trails. Scats available for detection may not relect scats deposited and variation in disappearance may bias results. Previous research has investigated natural decay and deterioration, but scats deposited along roads or trails are likely inluenced to a greater degree by anthropogenic disturbance in some systems. We used experimental plots to evaluate variation in scat removal for two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Road characteristics can influence scat persistence (Lonsinger et al. ) and detection (Kluever et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Road characteristics can influence scat persistence (Lonsinger et al. ) and detection (Kluever et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We characterized the road type of each transect as (1) unmaintained two‐track road, or maintained (2) single‐lane or (3) two‐lane gravel road (sensu Lonsinger et al. ). Scat detection may also be influenced by the presence of snow, survey date, and/or survey time (Harris et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we sampled during the winter coyote breeding season when the probability of detection should have been highest (Long et al 2008). Because the majority of transects were located in areas that were closed to vehicular access by the public, we did not apply correction factors that may be needed for scat transect sampling that occurs in areas subjected to high scat removal rates (Lonsinger et al 2016).…”
Section: Noninvasive Scat and Hair Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to monitor kit foxes and coyotes in the Great Basin Desert have included predator control indices, scat deposition surveys, live capture, den monitoring, and radiotelemetry (Arjo et al 2007;Kozlowski et al 2012;Kluever et al 2013;Dempsey et al 2014Dempsey et al , 2015. Scat deposition surveys provide indices of relative abundance (Gese 2001) but may suffer from misidentification of sign (Lonsinger et al 2015b) and often fail to account for spatiotemporal variation in scat detection (Kluever et al 2015;Lonsinger et al 2016). Live captures and radiotelemetry are expensive and time-consuming (Gese 2001), limiting the spatial and temporal extent of monitoring, and den monitoring often requires telemetered animals to locate dens (e.g., Arjo et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%