2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Aortic Valve Calcification using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed the calcium amount of the aortic valve and the upper LVOT within 1 cm under annulus, recalculating Agatston Units (AU) adapted from the calcium volume on given Hounsfield Units (HU) for overall, and separated leaflet calcium burden using the "Mercedes Benz" tool for localization. A pre-specific threshold of at least 600 HU was set to account for the hyperdensity of the applied contrast medium as practicable approach according to current research data (15). All MSCT-reconstructions and depending analyses were done by experienced level 3 readers, for the most part prospectively, partly retrospective in case of missing data.…”
Section: Procedural Details and 3d Image Analysis Of Msctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the calcium amount of the aortic valve and the upper LVOT within 1 cm under annulus, recalculating Agatston Units (AU) adapted from the calcium volume on given Hounsfield Units (HU) for overall, and separated leaflet calcium burden using the "Mercedes Benz" tool for localization. A pre-specific threshold of at least 600 HU was set to account for the hyperdensity of the applied contrast medium as practicable approach according to current research data (15). All MSCT-reconstructions and depending analyses were done by experienced level 3 readers, for the most part prospectively, partly retrospective in case of missing data.…”
Section: Procedural Details and 3d Image Analysis Of Msctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For now, there is no prognostic model and no consensus on a specific imaging biomarker that would allow for unambiguous, objective identification of patients with a high risk of PVL. The authors of only a few previous studies have attempted to establish an objective, quantitative methodology of AVC description (24,25). Single reports have indicated the role of AVC distribution in local PVL formation (26,27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alqahtani et al, in their studies, assessed the possibility to estimate AVCS based on the MSCT examination of coronary arteries, assuming the calcification detection threshold based on ROI density measurement parameters placed at the ascending aorta, i.e., based on the mean and standard deviation of the abovementioned density. The calcification detection threshold was calculated based on a mathematical formula: mean + 2x standard deviation [ 17 ]. Similar to our study, it has been concluded that AVCS estimation, based on the angiographic phase of MSCT examination is possible and its results are reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%