2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2757113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying Backtest Overfitting in Alternative Beta Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that Covariance-Penalties are a suitable procedure to avoid Backtesting Overfitting, and Total Least Squares provides superior performance when compared to Ordinary Least Squares.We can outline, chronologically, three distinct approaches in the literature to evaluate and deal with backtesting overfitting: Data Snooping, Overestimated Performance, and Cross-Validation Evaluation. The problem of overfitting cannot be understated, and innumerable references highlight the issues with phacking which has been an issue for considerable periods but making headlines more recently (see e.g., [35], [26], [7], [13]), and [24]) although it may not always be willful ([16]), and is pernicious in finance (see for instance, [44]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that Covariance-Penalties are a suitable procedure to avoid Backtesting Overfitting, and Total Least Squares provides superior performance when compared to Ordinary Least Squares.We can outline, chronologically, three distinct approaches in the literature to evaluate and deal with backtesting overfitting: Data Snooping, Overestimated Performance, and Cross-Validation Evaluation. The problem of overfitting cannot be understated, and innumerable references highlight the issues with phacking which has been an issue for considerable periods but making headlines more recently (see e.g., [35], [26], [7], [13]), and [24]) although it may not always be willful ([16]), and is pernicious in finance (see for instance, [44]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%