“…These maps help define the geological variability of the seafloor and improve the understanding of the processes that control the distribution and transport of bottom sediments, as well as the distribution of benthic habitats and associated infaunal community structures (Popper et al, 2006). Although shallow-water multibeam sonar technology (MBES) has been largely employed in mapping seabed morphology and composition (Augustin et al, 1996;Cauwenberghe, 1996;Mitchell, 1996;Shaw et al, 1997;Kammerer et al, 1998;Acosta et al, 2001;Dziak et al, 2001;Beyer et al, 2005;Knaapen et al, 2005;Chakraborty et al, 2006;Mayer, 2006), pipeline routes (Hansen and Simonis, 1994;Clasper, 1996;Paton et al, 1997; Ross et al, 2004), coral reefs (Grigg et al, 2002; Hovland et al, 2002;Conway et al, 2005;Roberts et al, 2005), and searching wrecks (Singh et al, 2000;Lawrence et al, 2001;Mayer and Kenneth, 2001;Mayer et al, 2003), it has not been used often in the fine detection of reef units, or to investigate their horizontal and vertical movements and subsidence (Shyue, 1998;Shyue and Yang, 2002).Starting with the above considerations, we carried out an assessment study at a 9-year old artificial reef deployed in the northern Adriatic Sea using an acoustic method involving both multibeam sonar for artificial reef mapping and a scientific echosounder for analysing fish distribution and movements during diel cycles at different periods of the year. The aim was to investigate the distribution of the reef fish assemblage in relation to the arrangement and state of the structures.…”