2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying biased signaling in GPCRs using BRET-based biosensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of pcDNA3.1-myc-OTR-WT was as previously described (68). The polycistronic G␣ q activation sensor was used as previously described (69).…”
Section: Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The generation of pcDNA3.1-myc-OTR-WT was as previously described (68). The polycistronic G␣ q activation sensor was used as previously described (69).…”
Section: Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, we used an established polycistronic G␣ q activation sensor that is based on physical separation of G␣ and G␥ subunits following receptor activation (69). Briefly, cells in white 96-well plates (Corning), transfected with the biosensor, and GPCR of interest were washed once and then left with 80 l of Kreb's buffer in a white 96-well plate.…”
Section: G␣ Q -Activation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon binding agonists, GPCRs couple to single or multiple Gprotein subtypes and initiate cell-specific signaling pathways. Studies with novel bioluminescence resonance energy transfer sensors show GPCRs exhibit a promiscuous and "pluridimensional" behavior, coupling to many Gα-proteins with different strengths (1)(2)(3)(4). While a receptor may show similar affinity to different Gα proteins, the cellular context may render certain couplings moot (1,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPASM is sensitive to measuring weak and dynamic protein−protein interactions in cellular conditions (29,37,38). This permits comparison between the binding affinities of cognate (canonical signaling partners) and noncognate (weak or uncharacterized partners) Gα proteins at the same stoichiometric ratios with the GPCR, which is not feasible with other biophysical techniques used in live cells (1,4,39,40). Recent findings with SPASM FRET sensors show a physiologic effect of noncognate G proteins to prime GPCR signaling within the cell (41), demonstrating the importance for probing these noncognate G-protein interactions within the cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRET has been successfully applied to study GPCR dimerization (Angers et al ., 2000), and more recently to study proximal interactions of GPCRs with different signaling effectors including G proteins and β-arrestins (Shukla et al ., 2008; Molinari et al ., 2010; Ceraudo et al ., 2014). Recent new advances in BRET technology include the discovery of biosensors, which do not involve the labeling of receptor as either a BRET donor or acceptor, and allow the identification of biased signaling from unknown compounds for any GPCR of interest (Namkung et al ., 2016). …”
Section: Discovering Biased Signaling On Gpcrmentioning
confidence: 99%