2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying cerebral blood arrival times using hypoxia-mediated arterial BOLD contrast

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was followed by computation of global transit time as the sum of estimates of the arterial transit time (computed as the average of voxels with positive lag times relative to center) and the venous transit time (computed as the average of voxels with negative lag times relative to center), with the majority of global transit time estimates falling into the range of 4–6 s ( Aso et al, 2020 ). Additionally, Bhogal et al (2022) implemented a carpet method for computing global transit times using controlled hypoxia as a source of BOLD contrast, yielding an average global transit time of 4.5 s. Similar investigation of using hypoxia to induce BOLD contrast has been explored in ( Sayin et al, 2022 ). These alternative approaches demonstrate the feasibility of BOLD signal-based methods for computing global transit time which do not rely on induced hypercapnia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was followed by computation of global transit time as the sum of estimates of the arterial transit time (computed as the average of voxels with positive lag times relative to center) and the venous transit time (computed as the average of voxels with negative lag times relative to center), with the majority of global transit time estimates falling into the range of 4–6 s ( Aso et al, 2020 ). Additionally, Bhogal et al (2022) implemented a carpet method for computing global transit times using controlled hypoxia as a source of BOLD contrast, yielding an average global transit time of 4.5 s. Similar investigation of using hypoxia to induce BOLD contrast has been explored in ( Sayin et al, 2022 ). These alternative approaches demonstrate the feasibility of BOLD signal-based methods for computing global transit time which do not rely on induced hypercapnia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is a an invasive imaging technique and the side-effects of gadolinium-based agents remaining in the human body are still debatable ( Essig et al, 2013 ), highlighting the need for a safer and more convenient alternative. Several different alternative methods for measurement of hemodynamic metrics, based on blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MRI, have been proposed ( Aso et al, 2020 ; Bhogal et al, 2022 ; Sayin et al, 2022 ). Recently, an increasing number of studies have used elevated CO 2 levels as a regressor to estimate the CO 2 /blood arrival time via BOLD MRI ( Blockley et al, 2011 ; Thomas et al, 2013a ; Duffin et al, 2015 ; Donahue et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subsequent dDSC processing was performed in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). Signal contribution from pial veins was suppressed by eliminating voxels with higher signal amplitude than the 98th percentile ( Bhogal et al, 2022 ). Whole brain (WB), GM, and WM perfusion values was computed by averaging voxels within brain and tissue-specific masks in each subject’s functional native space.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great cerebral veins not only have the largest signal intensity changes, but they have the longest delay relative to the global BOLD signal. Individual VOFs were obtained automatically by choosing 20 voxels with the highest integrated, rectified signal intensity ( Carroll et al, 2003 ) and delay greater than the 98th percentile ( Bhogal et al, 2022 ). To convert to concentration-time curve in both blood and tissue voxels, this manuscript assumed a linear relationship , with coefficients .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation